Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yezannnnn/agentGroup --skill prd-templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yezannnnn/agentGroupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yezannnnn/agentgroup/prd-template)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yezannnnn/agentgroup/prd-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yezannnnn/agentgroup/prd-template/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yezannnnn/agentgroup/prd-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yezannnnn/agentgroup/prd-template.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01200 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00480 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
prd-template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- prd-template — 86% identical, 29 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PRD Template Skill
This skill helps create professional Product Requirements Documents following industry best practices.
Template Structure
Every PRD should include these sections in order:
1. Overview
- Problem Statement: What problem are we solving? (2-3 sentences)
- Proposed Solution: High-level description of what we're building (2-3 sentences)
- Success Metrics: How we'll measure success (3-5 key metrics)
2. Context & Background
- Why Now: Why is this the right time?
- Strategic Alignment: How does this align with company objectives?
- User Research Summary: Key insights from research (if applicable)
3. User Stories & Use Cases
Format: "As a [user type], I want to [action] so that [benefit]"
- Include 3-7 primary user stories
- Add acceptance criteria for each
4. Requirements
Functional Requirements:
- Must-have features (P0)
- Should-have features (P1)
- Nice-to-have features (P2)
Non-Functional Requirements:
- Performance expectations
- Security considerations
- Accessibility requirements
5. Design & User Experience
- Link to design mocks or wireframes
- Key user flows
- Edge cases and error states
6. Technical Considerations
- Architecture implications
- Dependencies on other systems
- Technical risks and mitigations
7. Implementation Plan
- Phase 1 (MVP): What goes in first version
- Phase 2: What comes next
- Phase 3: Future enhancements
8. Open Questions
- Decisions that still need to be made
- Stakeholders to consult
- Research needed
9. Appendix
- Research links
- Related documents
- Competitive analysis
Writing Guidelines
Tone: Clear, concise, actionable Audience: Engineers, designers, stakeholders Length: Aim for 3-6 pages for features, 8-12 for products
Best Practices:
- Use concrete examples over abstractions
- Include "why" not just "what"
- Make requirements testable
- Link to supporting materials
- Update as decisions are made
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 92052aa196fc
prd-template is a skill published in the GitHub repository yezannnnn/agentGroup (150 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,200 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.