Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill ahp-weightinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahp-weighting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahp-weighting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahp-weighting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahp-weighting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/ahp-weighting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00636 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
ahp-weighting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
AHP Weighting
Use the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to determine scoring-dimension weights, outputting a weight vector.
HARD-GATE
Pipeline
- Precondition check: verify the dimension list is non-empty and its count is in the range [2, 9]
- Dimension list confirmation: output the dimension list for the caller to confirm; if a comparison matrix is already provided, skip to step 4
- Pairwise comparison matrix construction: for each pair of dimensions (i, j) assign a Saaty scale value (1-9); the matrix must satisfy a[j][i] = 1/a[i][j]
- Eigenvector computation: normalize each column then take row means to obtain the priority vector (weights)
- Consistency ratio check: compute the largest eigenvalue λ_max → consistency index CI = (λ_max - n)/(n-1) → CR = CI/RI (look up the Saaty RI table); CR < 0.1 is acceptable
- Output: return the AHPWeights object; if CR > 0.1 attach revision suggestions
Output Format
{
"dimensions": ["importance", "feasibility", "novelty", "impact"],
"comparison_matrix": [[1, 3, 2, 2], [0.33, 1, 0.5, 0.5], [0.5, 2, 1, 1], [0.5, 2, 1, 1]],
"weights": { "importance": 0.40, "feasibility": 0.15, "novelty": 0.23, "impact": 0.22 },
"lambda_max": 4.02,
"ci": 0.007,
"ri": 0.90,
"cr": 0.008,
"cr_acceptable": true,
"warnings": [],
"revision_suggestions": []
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 53 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d8815e5052f9
ahp-weighting is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine (456 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 636 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
Deep Research
Produce a deep, structured research report on a topic: decompose into key dimensions, analyze each with evidence and reasoning, synthesize cross-cutting insights, and surface open questions. Use for deep research, analysis, and literature/landscape reviews.
literature-review-tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use to ..." for…
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…
paper-fulltext-harvest
Batch download academic paper full-text (PDF/XML) from a list of DOIs. Handles 25 DOI prefixes across 19 publisher families via three layered routes: (1) publisher TDM APIs requiring institutional subscription (Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, Springer Nature), (2) Open Access sources (Crossref, Unpaywall…
academic-figure-generation
Generates publication-quality academic figures (framework diagrams, pipeline illustrations, system architectures, method overviews) from a paper's method text and a target caption, using a local PaperBanana multi-agent pipeline (Retriever → Planner → Stylist → Visualizer → Critic).
paper-reading
Reads and analyzes academic papers (arXiv preprints, conference / journal PDFs, Zotero items) at three configurable depths: quick skim (2 min), standard read (10 min), or deep analysis (30 min). Produces structured digests covering problem, method, key innovation, results, limitations, reproducibility, hidden…