Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill anomaly-characterizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/anomaly-characterization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/anomaly-characterization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/anomaly-characterization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/anomaly-characterization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/anomaly-characterization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00500 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00250 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
anomaly-characterization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Anomaly Characterization
Systematically describe and classify anomalous phenomena to provide a precise starting point for abductive reasoning.
HARD-GATE
Not satisfied → stop and return error: anomaly description insufficient, concrete observation and reference baseline required.
Pipeline
- Precondition check: verify completeness of anomaly description and reference baseline
- Phenomenon description: restate the anomaly in precise language (what was observed vs. what was expected)
- Quantify deviation from expectation: quantify or qualitatively describe the degree of deviation (magnitude, direction, frequency)
- Exclude known explanations: enumerate and rule out possible trivial explanations one by one (measurement error, sampling bias, known effects)
- Anomaly classification: categorize the anomaly (unexpected absence / unexpected presence / unexpected magnitude / unexpected pattern / unexpected timing)
- Output structured anomaly description
Output Format
{
"anomaly_id": "A1",
"phenomenon": "Precise description of what was observed",
"expected": "What theory or prior evidence predicted",
"deviation": {
"direction": "higher | lower | absent | present | different_pattern",
"magnitude": "Quantitative or qualitative estimate",
"frequency": "Isolated | recurring | systematic"
},
"excluded_explanations": [
{"explanation": "...", "reason_excluded": "..."}
],
"anomaly_type": "unexpected_absence | unexpected_presence | unexpected_magnitude | unexpected_pattern | unexpected_timing",
"severity": "minor | moderate | major",
"notes": "Additional context"
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 55 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 77419a77ea52
anomaly-characterization is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine (449 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
omnisci
Run OmniScientist end to end in the OmniScientist CLI using DeepSeek V4 Flash. Turn raw research data (images, signals, audio, video, 3-D, tables, or graphs) and an open direction into perceived evidence, a falsifiable hypothesis, recorded analysis, real citations, a gated candidate paper, PDF, and Overleaf bundle.…
nonlinear-solvers
Select and configure nonlinear solvers for f(x)=0 or min F(x). Use for Newton methods, quasi-Newton (BFGS, L-BFGS), Broyden, Anderson acceleration, diagnosing convergence issues, choosing line search vs trust region, and analyzing Jacobian quality.
linear-solvers
Select and configure linear solvers for systems Ax=b in dense and sparse problems. Use when choosing direct vs iterative methods, diagnosing convergence issues, estimating conditioning, selecting preconditioners, or debugging stagnation in GMRES/CG/BiCGSTAB.
numerical-stability
Analyze and enforce numerical stability for time-dependent PDE simulations. Use when selecting time steps, choosing explicit/implicit schemes, diagnosing numerical blow-up, checking CFL/Fourier criteria, von Neumann analysis, matrix conditioning, or detecting stiffness in advection/diffusion/reaction problems.
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…