Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill causal-necessity-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/causal-necessity-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/causal-necessity-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/causal-necessity-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/causal-necessity-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/causal-necessity-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00310 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
causal-necessity-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- causal-necessity-testing — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Causal Necessity Testing Tactic
PNS evaluation: for each causal claim, determine whether the cause is necessary, sufficient, both, or neither.
Orchestration
- causal-claim-extraction extracts all X→Y causal claims from the artifact
- necessity-evaluation asks: if X had NOT occurred, would Y still hold? (PN)
- sufficiency-evaluation asks: if X occurred in isolation, would Y follow? (PS)
- Classify each claim into quadrant:
- PN high + PS high → INUS condition (load-bearing)
- PN high + PS low → necessary but not sufficient
- PN low + PS high → sufficient but redundant
- PN low + PS low → spurious or decorative
- load-bearing-identification synthesizes quadrant assignments
Scoring
- PN and PS scored 0.0–1.0 (probability estimates)
- Threshold for "high": >= 0.7
- Threshold for "low": < 0.3
- Middle range (0.3–0.7): uncertain, flag for deeper investigation
Subagents Dispatched
- causal-claim-extraction (claim identification)
- necessity-evaluation (PN scoring per claim)
- sufficiency-evaluation (PS scoring per claim)
- load-bearing-identification (quadrant synthesis)
Termination Conditions
- All extracted claims evaluated within budget
- Early termination if INUS condition found and budget is S
- All claims score PN < 0.3 (no necessary factors found — conclusion may be overdetermined)
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| causal-claim-extraction | Extract all causal claims (X causes Y, X leads to Y, X enables Y) from an artifact, producing a structured list of cause-effect pairs. |
| load-bearing-identification | Identify which factors are "load-bearing walls" — factors whose removal would collapse the conclusion. |
| necessity-evaluation | Evaluate the probability of necessity (PN) for a causal factor — would the conclusion fail if this factor were absent? |
| sufficiency-evaluation | Evaluate the probability of sufficiency (PS) for a causal factor — would this factor alone be enough to produce the conclusion? |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 68 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 29a317fced6d
causal-necessity-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine (449 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 620 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
omnisci
Run OmniScientist end to end in the OmniScientist CLI using DeepSeek V4 Flash. Turn raw research data (images, signals, audio, video, 3-D, tables, or graphs) and an open direction into perceived evidence, a falsifiable hypothesis, recorded analysis, real citations, a gated candidate paper, PDF, and Overleaf bundle.…
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…
academic-figure-generation
Generates publication-quality academic figures (framework diagrams, pipeline illustrations, system architectures, method overviews) from a paper's method text and a target caption, using a local PaperBanana multi-agent pipeline (Retriever → Planner → Stylist → Visualizer → Critic).
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on…
research-log
Record, manage, and query research experiment logs. Use when the user wants to log an experiment result, amend an existing entry, view recent logs, rebuild the index, or plan, execute, repeat, or diagnose research in a project containing docs/researchlog/. Triggers on phrases like "log this experiment", "record…