Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric --skill initialize-projectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabricWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/initialize-project)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/initialize-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/initialize-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/initialize-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/initialize-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00485 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00194 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
initialize-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to initialize-project — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Initialize Project
Purpose
This skill automates the initial setup of a new project derived from this template. It leverages AI capabilities to directly modify project metadata and documentation by replacing placeholders, ensuring a clean start for a new repository.
Instructions
- Gather Information: Ask the user for:
- New project name (e.g.,
my-awesome-app) - Project description
- Author name
- (Optional) GitHub repository URL
- New project name (e.g.,
- Update Project Metadata: Directly update the following files using the
WriteorStrReplacetools:package.json: Updatename,description, andauthor.packages/common/package.json: Update the package name to match the new scope (e.g.,@new-name/common)..trunk/trunk.yaml: If there are template-specific references, update them.
- Update README Placeholders: Use the
StrReplacetool to replace the placeholders inREADME.mdwith the gathered information:{PROJECT_NAME}-> New project name{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}-> Project description{LICENSE}->ISC(or other preferred license)
- Install Dependencies: Run
pnpm installto update the lockfile with the new package names. - Final Cleanup: Remove the initialization skill and its related files once bootstrapping is complete, if requested by the user.
Examples
Example 1: Initializing a new CLI tool
Input: User says "Initialize this project as 'json-fixer', a CLI tool to fix broken JSON files." Action:
- Gather details from the user (Name: json-fixer, Description: A CLI tool to fix broken JSON files, Author: [Author Name]).
- Update
package.jsonwith the new metadata. - Use
StrReplaceonREADME.mdto swap{PROJECT_NAME},{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}, and{LICENSE}with the actual values. - Run
pnpm install.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 9dc21d46f27f
initialize-project is a skill published in the GitHub repository yu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric (1 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 485 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to initialize-project, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
delegate-coding-agent
Route coding work to another local coding-agent CLI through the llm-provider MCP server. Use when a task benefits from a powerful model for difficult reasoning or a faster, lower-cost model for bounded implementation, tests, investigation, or review.
firebase-messaging
Use when setting up Firebase Cloud Messaging, managing permissions and tokens, handling background/foreground notification taps, or dispatching messages server-side (HTTP v1).
firebase-cloud-functions
Use when calling callable functions (httpsCallable), passing data to server-side logic, handling function errors/timeouts, configuring regions, or testing with the Emulator Suite.
verify
Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.
customer-deck-builder
Build tailored customer-facing sales or customer success decks from approved account context and generate the presentation with Gamma through Zapier MCP.
deep-research
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question…