Nature Skills is a collection of reusable skills that help AI agents handle academic writing and scientific visualization. Researchers and AI-assisted scholars use it to turn research tasks into repeatable workflows and usable outputs. The catalogue entries are skills from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Yuan1z0825/nature-skills --skill nature-responsegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yuan1z0825/nature-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-skills/nature-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-skills/nature-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-skills/nature-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-skills/nature-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-skills/nature-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00192 | $0.01465 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00096 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00293 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
nature-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- nature-response — 86% identical, 26 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Nature Reviewer Response — Router
This skill is split into two layers:
- A static layer under
static/that holds versioned, reusable content fragments (the default stance and red lines, and the response workflow with output format). - A dynamic layer (this file plus
manifest.yaml) that loads the core every time and reaches for the deeper response references or templates only when a step needs them.
Do not try to apply the response logic from memory or from this router. Always load fragments from disk as described below.
Routing protocol
Follow these four steps every time the skill is invoked.
1. Load the manifest and the core layer
Read manifest.yaml. Then read every file listed under always_load:
static/core/stance.md— the editor-facing purpose, the default stance, the red lines, and the source hierarchy that apply to every response job.static/core/workflow.md— accepted inputs, the revision correspondence workflow, and the output package format.
2. No content axis — identify mode and language inline
Unlike nature-writing or nature-figure, nature-response has no fragment axis. Its variation is identified at runtime, not by loading different content bodies:
- task mode —
draft/audit/revise/triage-only/cover-letter/revision-package/latex-template/appeal-like. - decision type — minor revision, major revision, revise-and-resubmit, transfer after review, or unclear.
- user language — if the user writes Chinese, also produce the 中文核对 block.
Decision type is a required intake gate for normal revision work. First extract it from an
editor decision letter when available. If it is still unclear, ask the user whether this is a
Major Revision or Minor Revision before drafting a response strategy or response prose. Do
not infer the decision from the number, tone, or apparent difficulty of reviewer comments.
Use references/intake-and-routing.md to fix the task mode, minimum inputs, and readiness state before drafting. Route appeal-like cases separately; do not draft an appeal as the default path.
What ships with it
36 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 248 B
- examples/conflicting-reviewers.md 1.8 KB
- examples/major-revision-with-missing-evidence.md 1.5 KB
- examples/minor-revision.md 1.8 KB
- manifest.yaml 4.1 KB
- README_EN.md 4.2 KB
- README.md 3.8 KB
- references/action-mapping.md 8.0 KB
- references/chinese-author-alignment.md 3.3 KB
- references/comment-taxonomy.md 4.1 KB
- references/difficult-cases.md 5.7 KB
- references/intake-and-routing.md 9.0 KB
- references/latex-templates.md 3.1 KB
- references/package-consistency-audit.md 10 KB
- references/qa-checklist.md 7.2 KB
- references/response-structure.md 8.6 KB
- references/source-basis.md 3.4 KB
- references/tone-and-stance.md 4.6 KB
- scripts/check_package_consistency.py 9.9 KB runs code
- static/core/stance.md 5.7 KB
- static/core/workflow.md 8.9 KB
- templates/cover-letter.tex 1.4 KB
- templates/response-to-reviewers.tex 2.0 KB
- templates/revised-manuscript-redline.tex 1.3 KB
- tests/conflicting-reviewers.md 2.5 KB
- tests/defensive-draft-audit.md 2.2 KB
- tests/evaluation-summary.md 2.8 KB
- tests/impossible-experiment.md 1.6 KB
- tests/major-revision-missing-evidence.md 1.8 KB
- tests/minor-revision.md 1.4 KB
- tests/reviewer-visibility.md 1.9 KB
- tests/rubric.md 5.6 KB
- tests/task-status-tracking.md 1.2 KB
- tests/test_package_consistency.py 6.0 KB runs code
- tests/test_response_instruction_contracts.py 1.4 KB runs code
- tests/unclear-decision-type.md 1.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 77 lines · 192 tokens per session scan A 909a819e1cb7
nature-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository Yuan1z0825/nature-skills (40,913 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 192 tokens to every session and 1,465 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
literature-searcher
Search CrossRef, OpenAlex, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and optional Scopus; deduplicate results, download open-access PDFs by DOI, classify papers, monitor new results, and analyze coverage. Use when asked to search literature, monitor a topic, download an open-access paper, classify papers, or analyze literature gaps.
academic-research
Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.
academic-trend-research
Research emerging academic trends by combining scholarly databases, web sources, and news to identify rising research areas, breakthrough papers, and shifting scientific consensus. Ideal for R&D teams tracking frontier science.
using-cesiumjs-skills
Use when starting any conversation involving CesiumJS development - provides orientation on available domain skills and how they activate.
latex-empirical-tables
Set up, format, fix, and clean up LaTeX regression and estimation tables in empirical economics or finance papers. Use when (a) creating a .tex, results.tex, main.tex, or preamble to display regression or estimation output from Python (pyfixest), Stata, or R — including any mention of estout, esttab, estauto, estwide…
cite-placement
Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote…