Use when checking whether a legal memo, contract review, demand letter, risk matrix, research summary, draft filing, or other legal AI output is reliable enough to rely on — adversarially stress-testing it before attorney review to surface invented authority, unsupported claims, weak reasoning, jurisdiction and…
Use when applying a structured, jurisdiction-agnostic method to identify, rate, and prioritize legal risks in a situation, producing a risk register with severity bands and a prioritized summary for attorney review.
Use when classifying whether cited sources, authorities, quotations, dates, and factual claims in draft legal work product are supported by materials available in the session, applying the source hierarchy in core/source-and-citation-discipline.md.
Use when applying a disciplined analytical method to parse and interpret a statutory, regulatory, or contractual provision — mapping structure, defined terms, and competing readings — to produce a structured interpretation worksheet for attorney review.
Use when an inbound business request reaches the legal team — an email, ticket, form submission, or chat ask — to produce a structured intake triage that classifies the request, captures urgency as stated, surfaces conflict-check and confidentiality questions, and proposes a routing recommendation for the legal team…
Use when preparing a structured briefing for a meeting with legal relevance — assembling background, participants, agenda, key documents, open issues, legal considerations, talking points, and a follow-up action-item tracker from the materials provided.
Use when a document is believed final and ready to sign — to run a pre-signature completeness checklist, identify signers and signing order, flag blockers, and produce a routing plan for attorney review before the document is sent for execution.
Use when drafting a response to a routine, recurring legal inquiry from a configured template, with a built-in escalation gate that stops the templated path when the matter shows characteristics that require individualized counsel review.
Use when synthesizing a rule statement from multiple judicial opinions (and, where relevant, statutory or secondary sources) for a single Question Presented, producing a structured synthesis with explicit majority-and-minority handling, a temporal-confidence pass for older authority, and a Holding / Relevance / Weight…
Use when producing a structured brief of a single judicial opinion for attorney review, extracting the facts, procedural posture, issue, holding, reasoning, rule, and weight in a fixed template — with every slot tied to a specific passage in the provided opinion and the case verified against…
Use when you need to check whether the authorities cited in a draft or research memo are still good law — organizing a citator-style verification plan for each authority, recording provided citator-report signals as attributed claims, and classifying each authority's verification status, without ever asserting from…
Use when tracing the amendment history of a specific CFR section — what the text said on a given date, which Federal Register rulemakings amended it, and what version was in effect at a specific point in time — producing a date-stable history table for attorney review, verified through connectors/ecfr.md and…
Use when scoping a legal-research task before any research is conducted, producing a research roadmap of statute leads, case-law areas, search terms, and source-hierarchy targets — with no citations and no analysis — so the attorney can approve the scope before authority is gathered.
Use when drafting a single section of a litigation brief — such as a statement of facts, argument section, standard of review, or conclusion — that is cited to the record, consistent with the case theory, and fully flagged for attorney verification before filing.
Use when building an element-by-element claim chart — mapping patent claim limitations or the elements of a civil cause of action or affirmative defense against evidence — to produce a structured gap analysis for attorney review.
Use when building a structured deposition outline from the case theory, witness profile, and documentary record to produce a focused, attorney-ready map for taking or defending a deposition.
Use when organizing responses to written discovery — document requests, interrogatories, or requests for admission — inventorying each request verbatim into a response tracker, organizing objection candidates and privilege candidates as questions for counsel, planning collection and custodians, and drafting response…
Use when preparing a litigation hold notice and preservation-scope summary — issuing a new hold, refreshing an existing one, or releasing a closed one — as draft legal work product for attorney review before distribution to custodians.
Use when organizing and drafting a DRAFT opposition or response brief to a pending motion — deconstructing the movant's arguments into a point-by-point response outline, mapping the movant's cited authorities to verification placeholders, and assembling a source-cited opposition draft for attorney review before filing.
Use when conducting a first-pass review of a privilege log to sort entries into three tiers — confidently privileged, uncertain (flagged for attorney decision), and recommend-remove — so attorney review time focuses on the entries that require judgment.
Use when an incoming subpoena has been received to produce a structured triage summary identifying the compliance deadline, scope, objections, privilege issues, preservation obligations, and internal notification requirements for immediate attorney review.
Use when building a closing checklist of deliverables for an M&A transaction, tracking responsible party, status, dependencies, and signature and delivery needs.
Use when reviewing an M&A data room index or file list to identify missing diligence categories, coverage gaps, and follow-up requests for attorney review.
★not rated 19▲
+1 1mo agoA34 tokens
originalMIT
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: