Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zhonghao1995/Agentic-MIKE-Plus --skill mike-comparegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zhonghao1995/Agentic-MIKE-PlusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhonghao1995/agentic-mike-plus/mike-compare)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhonghao1995/agentic-mike-plus/mike-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhonghao1995/agentic-mike-plus/mike-compare/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhonghao1995/agentic-mike-plus/mike-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhonghao1995/agentic-mike-plus/mike-compare.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.00888 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
mike-compare scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MIKE+ Compare
Closes the loop identify -> change -> re-run -> compare. Works on any two .res1d
files with the same element ids (same model, different parameters / scenario / rain).
Making the two runs (do this on COPIES, not MIKE+ scenarios)
runs/<case>/00_model_baseline/ <- copy of the model folder, untouched
runs/<case>/00_model_<variant>/ <- second copy; mike_set_values here only
mike_run on each -> A.res1d (baseline), B.res1d (variant)
Why not mike_set_scenario + create a scenario? Verified on MIKE+ 2026: a scenario
created through mikeplus shares its parent's alternatives, so an edit "in the
scenario" changes Base too; and if the scenario is given its own alternatives,
mikeplus cannot write into them (mike_set_values reports "did not persist").
mike_set_scenario is therefore only for running scenarios that were prepared in
the GUI. Copies are unambiguous and audit-friendly.
Tools
mike_results_compare—{res1d_a, res1d_b, quantity, element?, skip_hours?, top_n?, label_a?, label_b?}- ranked mode (no
element): peak change for every element ofquantity, sorted by |delta| —by_element.top[],n_increased / n_decreased / n_unchanged,n_only_a/b(ids missing on one side). Ask this first: "where did my edit matter?" - single mode (
elementgiven):comparison{peak_a, peak_b, delta_peak, delta_peak_pct, peak_time_a/b, peak_time_shift_min, mean_a/b, max_abs_diff(+time), rmse, nse_b_vs_a}; for flow quantities (unitm3/s) alsovolume_a/b, delta_volume(_pct)inm3.aligned=exact(same time base) orinterpolated(B was interpolated onto A's steps; say so).
- ranked mode (no
mike_plot_compare—{res1d_a, res1d_b, quantity?, element, out_png, label_a?, label_b?, rain_dfs0?, skip_hours?}→ overlay (baseline dashed grey, variant solid orange), optional inverted hyetograph on top. House style; no title.
Conventions
- Same simulation setup and time window on both sides; pass the same
skip_hours(warm-up) to both. - Report deltas signed, with units and %, plus the peak times: "peak +0.041 m3/s (+5.2 %), 6 min earlier".
- Volume only for flows; for levels use
mean/max_abs_diff. nse_b_vs_ameasures how different B is from A (1 = identical), not model skill.- If
n_only_a/n_only_b > 0, the two runs are not the same network: say so before comparing further. - Do not claim a figure exists unless the tool returned
{ok:true, png}.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 50 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 47926343409a
mike-compare is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zhonghao1995/Agentic-MIKE-Plus (7 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 888 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autonomous-researcher
End-to-end research pipeline: scoping, literature review, hypothesis formation, synthesis, empirical validation, and written output.
research-librarian
Organize sources, claims, and open questions so research stays traceable.
Jupyter Live Kernel
Guides notebook-first analysis with reproducible kernels, inspectable data loading, and explicit promotion paths back into durable code.
arXiv
Search, filter, and summarize arXiv papers with explicit titles, authors, dates, and paper links before drawing conclusions.
ras-end-to-end
Standard operating procedure for an auditable, headless HEC-RAS workflow via the hec-ras MCP server — how to plan, copy, edit boundaries, run, QA-gate, read results, compare, plot, audit, and safely stop. Use FIRST whenever an agent is handed a HEC-RAS project (.prj folder) or a results file (.p##.hdf) plus a…
ras-results
Read, compare and plot HEC-RAS results (.p##.hdf) via the hec-ras MCP server without HEC-RAS — one-screen run summary (QA, volume accounting, cross-section peaks, 2D wet cells / max depth, reference lines), one time series with peak and timing (cross section, reference line / point, boundary, 2D cell)…