Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/zjunlp/mechanist/multi-modalnpx skills add zjunlp/Mechanist --skill multi-modalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zjunlp/MechanistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zjunlp/mechanist/multi-modal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zjunlp/mechanist/multi-modal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zjunlp/mechanist/multi-modal.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00228 | $0.01468 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00114 | $0.00734 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00294 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00147 |
Grade A, and why
Multi-Modal Interpretability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Advantage
By delegating the language side to a pre-trained vision-language model, multi-modal interpretability avoids the labor-intensive step of crowdsourcing per-neuron labels and scales to open-vocabulary concept sets — any text the alignment model recognises is a candidate label. The resulting concept-level explanations compose naturally with attribution: one can mask, swap, or steer a labelled neuron / SAE feature and observe the downstream effect on predictions, producing concept-conditional heatmaps and feature-visualisation videos that describe both what a unit represents and how it is used.
Limitation
Explanations inherit the biases and blind spots of the underlying alignment model: anything CLIP cannot embed cleanly (fine-grained categories, novel domains, low-resource languages, abstract qualifiers) yields noisy or empty concept rankings. Probing-image and concept-set selection also matter — different reference distributions can label the same neuron differently, so reported descriptions should always be read together with the concept set used. Finally, a high similarity score localises a concept correlationally; whether the unit is causally responsible for the model using that concept still requires interventional follow-up.
Submethods
The category typically takes two forms:
- Concept-Set Neuron Description (CLIP-Dissect): A scalable, training-free pipeline that automatically labels neurons in any vision DNN. For each neuron $u$, one collects its activations over a probing image set, summarises them into $\mathbf{a}_u$, and selects the concept $c \in \mathcal{C}$ whose CLIP text-embedding is most similar to the visual signature of those high-activating images. The resulting per-neuron descriptions cover the entire network — convolutional and transformer-based image classifiers alike — and let researchers compare neuron meanings across architectures, layers, and probing distributions. You can find a demo for this method in ./clip-dissect. This demo shows clip_dissect: Use this skill when you need to automatically describe or interpret the functionality of individual neurons in deep neural networks (DNNs) using CLIP-based semantic analysis, perform mechanistic interpretability research on vision models, dissect convolutional or transformer-based image classifiers, identify what visual concepts activate specific neurons, or compare neuron descriptions across different probing datasets and concept sets.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- article_references.md 415 B
- clip-dissect/article_references.md 164 B
- clip-dissect/scripts/run_clip_dissect.py 15 KB runs code
- clip-dissect/SKILL.md 23 KB
- zennit-crp/article_references.md 175 B
- zennit-crp/scripts/conditional_attribution_demo.py 11 KB runs code
- zennit-crp/scripts/feature_visualization_demo.py 7.2 KB runs code
- zennit-crp/SKILL.md 34 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 51 lines · 228 tokens per session scan A 9ccdb9127750
Multi-Modal Interpretability is a skill published in the GitHub repository zjunlp/Mechanist (51 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 228 tokens to every session and 1,468 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
scienceworld-animal-identifier
Use when the agent needs to locate, identify, and focus on a specific animal or biological entity in the ScienceWorld environment. This skill handles tasks involving animal comparison, examination, or interaction (such as determining lifespan extremes) by navigating to the correct location with "teleport to"…
scienceworld-inventory-focus
Use when the agent needs to confirm and prepare a specific inventory item before using it in an experiment or task step. This "focus on [ITEM] in inventory" action verifies the correct item has been collected and signals intent, ensuring operational readiness for subsequent actions like measurement, combination, or…
nanoresearch-writing
Draft a LaTeX research paper from all previous stage outputs.
nanoresearch-experiment
Generate a Python code skeleton from an experiment blueprint.
nanoresearch-ideation
Search academic literature and generate research hypotheses.
scienceworld-circuit-builder
This skill constructs a simple electrical circuit by connecting components like batteries, wires, and light bulbs. Use when the agent needs to test electrical conductivity or create a functional circuit for an experiment. The input is a set of available components, and the output is a fully connected circuit ready for…