17,691 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
AI coding agent orchestrator for Claude Code — resolve GitHub issues end-to-end with isolated git worktrees and quality gates, through spec → exec → qa phases.
★not rated 1
changed yesterdayA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
PostToolUse hook that flags unnecessary comments. Runs comment-checker, then direnv exec if it is missing. Names flake.nix when that is why it is missing.
★not rated 1 6d agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
A code-review pipeline that runs preliminary checks, sends code to specialised read-only checks, independently verifies findings, and makes a final decision.
Local code reviewer and the designated reviewer for Codex-authored diffs. Use before any merge whenever the diff was authored by Codex (Codex never reviews its own work), Codex is unavailable, its quota window is exhausted, or the code must not leave the machine. Reviews the branch diff against its spec for…
Expert code quality reviewer for newly created/modified code. Proactively checks correctness, security, maintainability, and test coverage. Use proactively after code changes.
Codex Adversarial Review - Lite: user-invoked audit workflow for Claude Code users who want Codex CLI to independently review AI-generated code, plans, test expectations, and scope before fixes are applied. Cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux, WSL). Use only when the user explicitly invokes audit or selftest.
Use this agent when you want to eliminate code duplication across your codebase. Examples: Context: User has just written several similar functions and wants to clean up duplication. user: 'I just added these three validation functions that seem really similar' assistant: 'Let me use the code-deduplicator agent to…
Baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review. Use detailed frontend or backend skills for framework-specific patterns.
Use when asked to proofread, review, or 校对 code or documents for correctness, logical consistency, or quality issues. Covers general code logic review (any language), plus formal-verification backends for C (ACSL contracts via Frama-C static proof and E-ACSL runtime checks), Python (icontract + CrossHair), Rust (Kani…
Dispatch a review to the Bridge, which resolves the reviewer Lane from this machine's Machine Config. Use when a review is asked for without naming a lane, or when a review-skill invocation was refused and pointed here.
Use when reviewing or writing code that contains Russian-language UI strings, i18n locale files (ru.json, ru.yml, ru.po), Russian comments, or transliterated identifiers (polzovatel, tovar, kolichestvo). Triggers on mixed English-code + Russian-content projects. Does not cover typography, spelling, or ё/е.
Three-phase Claude Code Codex CLI collaboration workflow: Claude plans and writes the spec, a Claude subagent implements in the host working tree, a fresh Codex session adversarially reviews the diff. Implementation and review are never the same model. For code changes that deserve a written spec.
★not rated 1
changed 6d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Expert code reviewer. Proactively reviews code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use after implementing features or fixing bugs to ensure code quality.
Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?".
A thinking partner for Claude Code. The instrument you reach for when you want to pause, get a second perspective, or check the assumptions baked into what you're about to ship. Adds /quill:consult, /quill:perspective, and /quill:assumptions slash commands.
★not rated 1 3mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Adversarial collaborator who pushes back like a senior engineer - the default adversarial reviewer. Surfaces hidden assumptions, grounds every challenge in evidence, presents real counterpoints with proven alternatives, drives toward synthesis, and records settled claims as verdict nodes in docs/verdicts/ so an…
Use when reviewing a pull request or branch diff with fixed perspectives and unified findings. Orchestrates code-reviewer, silent-failure-hunter, pr-test-analyzer, comment-analyzer, type-design-analyzer, and code-simplifier viewpoints.
Fully automatic GitHub PR review and production deployment gate for trusted repos. Use when configuring or operating a scheduled PR gate that checks open PRs, downloads them locally, runs complete containerized validation with mocked external services, comments or rejects failing PRs, promotes passing PRs through…
★not rated 1 2mo agoA119 tokens
originalMIT
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: