19,479 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
A general spec-driven software development workflow for Claude Code: detect project domain/conventions, research, weigh solution options, plan, implement in reviewed phases (code review every phase; a security scan whenever a phase touches a sensitive surface), and run a final cross-phase security audit. Stops for…
★not rated 2
changed 10d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Cursor rule "clean-code" from ChiragAgg5k/poke-mcp, covering clean code guidelines, constants over magic numbers, meaningful names, smart comments and single responsibility.
Use Google Antigravity (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude, GPT-OSS) as an independent second-opinion / code-review model inside Claude Code — via MCP, one command, zero dependencies. Runs locally from the antigravity-claude-mcp npm package. Needs 2 environment variables to run.
★not rated 3 4mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Collaborative code review CLI — browse diffs, leave structured comments, and save review reports. Token-efficient alternative to the MCP server: agents invoke batch-review via their shell tool instead of loading tool schemas into context.
★not rated 2 8d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
MCP server "ndlovu-code-reviewer" as configured in shaunie2fly/ndlovu-code-reviewer. Runs /mnt/nvme1-data/home/shaunbotsis/development/ndlovu-code-reviewer/dist/index.js with node.
MCP server "ndlovu-code-reviewer" as configured in shaunie2fly/mjmlmcp. Runs /mnt/nvme1-data/home/shaunbotsis/development/ndlovu-code-reviewer/dist/index.js with node.
Behavioral verification intelligence for autonomous coding agents. Use this skill when the user asks "what could break in this PR?", "which workflows changed?", "what should I test before merging?", "is this change risky?", "what's the blast radius of removing this function?", or any question about understanding the…
Project governance and engineering coaching for AI coding agents: align requirements and interface design, reuse frameworks and components, improve code quality, and deliver with evidence.
★not rated 2
changed 9d agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
Run Matt Shumer's Gauntlet Loop methodology to raise the quality of an artifact through cycles of building, independent critique, comparison against real references, and improvement. Use when the user asks for the Gauntlet Loop, a builder-critic process, adversarial critique, iterative refinement, or the creation of…
Rigorous, evidence-backed code review for high-stakes changes. Trigger on: rigorous review, thorough review, deep review, review this PR properly, review before merge, high-stakes review, "is this actually safe to merge", regulated or compliance code review, batch-review these PRs. Every finding carries quoted…
Architecture-level code review from a fifty-year veteran: design, boundaries, data and error paths — never naming or formatting. One verdict, every finding that earns its place, every claim demonstrated in code. Reviews a diff in the conversation or posts one review into a GitHub PR / GitLab MR. Briefs a change before.
★not rated 2
changed 18d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Review the current diff against path-scoped rules (secrets, RLS/tenant scoping, Stripe webhook verification, input validation, scope), flag changed code lacking tests, and run a quick security pass. Reports findings; nothing auto-fixed without approval.
MCP server for semantic code search and codebase analysis — Treesitter parsing, AST extraction, and embedding-based indexing for any LLM that supports MCP. Runs locally from the src-mcp npm package.
★not rated 2▲
+1 1mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
MCP server bridging Claude Code and GPT Codex for collaborative brainstorming and code review. Runs locally from the @ndcorder/codex-bridge npm package.
★not rated 2 6mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Explain substantial completed code changes as a guided technical walkthrough with Mermaid diagrams and an efficient, dependency-aware review order. Use after implementing a feature, bug fix, or refactor, or when the user asks what changed, how the new flow works, or which generated code to review first. Do not use for…
Review repository architecture using Ontoly Software Graph and MCP capabilities. Use when asked to explain architecture, module boundaries, package topology, service ownership, or architectural risk.
Run Evolith architecture validation and report a coverage-honest verdict. Use when asked to validate architecture, check ADR compliance, run architecture or governance rules, check an SDLC phase gate, or answer "does this repo pass architecture review". Also before merging, releasing or promoting a phase. Reports…
Integrate the PR base, run persistent read-only reviewers, fix and re-review findings, validate with repo-native commands, address review bots, and compare model quality.
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: