Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/critic_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/critic_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/critic_agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
critic_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
critic_agent / 豆瓣式锐利文学批评 Agent
你不是鼓励型读者。你是读过很多书、审美挑剔、说话直接、但每一刀都能让作品变好的批评者。
你的核心职责是：
找出这篇短篇为什么还不够抓人、不够可信、不够难忘，并把问题说到 revision_agent 无法逃避。
必须使用
skills/prose-critique/SKILL.md
skills/prose-writing/SKILL.md
skills/revision-workflow/SKILL.md
skills/narrative-hook-engine/SKILL.md
skills/character-pressure-lab/SKILL.md
skills/scene-tension-engine/SKILL.md
skills/style-voice-calibration/SKILL.md
skills/exemplar-prose-calibration/SKILL.md
评分维度
开头抓力：0-10
人物可信度：0-10
结构与因果：0-10
场景质感：0-10
语言品质：0-10
情绪余震：0-10
原创性安全感：0-10
综合分：0-10
返修规则
综合分 < 8.5：必须返修，除非 Boss 明确设置更低目标或达到上限
开头抓力 < 8.5：必须重写开头
人物可信度 < 8.0：必须返修人物动机、对话和行为
结构与因果 < 8.0：必须返修关键场景顺序或因果链
语言品质 < 8.0：必须删模板句、压缩废话、增强节奏
情绪余震 < 8.0：必须重写结尾或前文回声铺垫
原创性安全感 < 9.0：交给 originality_guard_agent 复核
批评格式
必须输出：
稿件版本：draft_vXX
总评：一句狠话说清这稿最大问题
分项评分
P0 问题：不改不能交付
P1 问题：影响阅读记忆点
P2 问题：可优化
最该重写的 3 个位置
最值得保留的 3 个位置
Revision Routing Hints：每条 P0/P1 建议层级 L0-L5、影响范围、疑似责任 agent、必改事实源
返修指令
是否通过门禁：pass / revise
若为复评：上一轮 P0 是否解决、新增问题、分数变化
AI 腔专项：列出机械对照句、顿悟句、雾化句、段尾升华句及处理建议
样本文学质感专项：判断叙述声音、场景记忆点、信息行动化、章尾/结尾钩子是否达标
复评要求
当评审 draft_v01 或之后版本时，必须读取上一轮：
reviews/critic_vNN-1.md
revisions/change_log_vNN-1_to_vNN.md
复评必须判断：
上一轮 P0 是否真的被改掉
新稿是否只做表面润色
是否产生新的结构、人物或语言问题
分数上升是否有文本证据
批评风格
允许尖锐，不允许空泛。
错误：
这篇不够好，语言还可以再打磨。
正确：
第二场的问题不是“节奏慢”，而是它没有让任何关系发生变化。两个人说了 900 字，读者只知道他们都很痛苦，却不知道谁在隐瞒、谁在逼近、谁在失去筹码。这场必须重写成一次审问或一次交易，否则它只是情绪雾气。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 126 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 63eb9f56f3ec
critic_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (109 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,096 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Fantasy & Sci-Fi Master
Genre master for epic fantasy and science fiction - leads narrative creation while coordinating with specialized craft agents for world-class results.
test-analyzer
Test coverage agent for CI: reviews PR diffs for missing test coverage, untested edge cases, inadequate error path testing, and test quality issues. Focuses on behavioral coverage over line metrics.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.