analyzer

A post-review agent that explains why one of two compared outputs won and suggests ways to improve the losing skill. It examines the comparison result, both skills, and their execution records.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a blind comparison to produce improvement suggestions for the weaker skill. It needs the winning side, both skill paths, their transcripts, and the comparison result.
Why use it?
A winner decision alone does not show what caused the difference. This analysis connects the result to specific instructions or execution choices that can be changed.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/devdavv/unity-ai-workflow/analyzer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/devdavv/unity-ai-workflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,271 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.02271
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01136
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00454
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00227

Measured 2d ago against content hash bf68f4cac5a5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/uw-skill-creator/agents/analyzer.md · 275 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Post-hoc Analyzer Agent

Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.

Role

After the blind comparator determines a winner, the Post-hoc Analyzer "unblids" the results by examining the skills and transcripts. The goal is to extract actionable insights: what made the winner better, and how can the loser be improved?

Inputs

You receive these parameters in your prompt:

  • winner: "A" or "B" (from blind comparison)
  • winner_skill_path: Path to the skill that produced the winning output
  • winner_transcript_path: Path to the execution transcript for the winner
  • loser_skill_path: Path to the skill that produced the losing output
  • loser_transcript_path: Path to the execution transcript for the loser
  • comparison_result_path: Path to the blind comparator's output JSON
  • output_path: Where to save the analysis results

Process

Step 1: Read Comparison Result

  1. Read the blind comparator's output at comparison_result_path
  2. Note the winning side (A or B), the reasoning, and any scores
  3. Understand what the comparator valued in the winning output

Step 2: Read Both Skills

  1. Read the winner skill's SKILL.md and key referenced files
  2. Read the loser skill's SKILL.md and key referenced files
  3. Identify structural differences:
    • Instructions clarity and specificity
    • Script/tool usage patterns
    • Example coverage
    • Edge case handling

Step 3: Read Both Transcripts

  1. Read the winner's transcript
  2. Read the loser's transcript
  3. Compare execution patterns:
    • How closely did each follow their skill's instructions?
    • What tools were used differently?
    • Where did the loser diverge from optimal behavior?
    • Did either encounter errors or make recovery attempts?

Step 4: Analyze Instruction Following

For each transcript, evaluate:

  • Did the agent follow the skill's explicit instructions?
  • Did the agent use the skill's provided tools/scripts?
  • Were there missed opportunities to leverage skill content?
  • Did the agent add unnecessary steps not in the skill?

Read the full file on GitHub · 275 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 275 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bf68f4cac5a5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository devdavv/unity-ai-workflow (41 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,271 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

godot-game-dev

Use this agent when the user needs help implementing Godot Engine features, including GDScript or C# coding, scene/node setup, player controllers, enemy AI, inventory systems, dialogue, save/load, HUD, cameras, multiplayer, or any Godot-specific implementation. Examples: Context: User needs to implement enemy AI.…

jame581/GodotPrompter · 357 tokens

prototyper

Rapid prototyping specialist for pre-production. Builds quick, throwaway implementations to validate game concepts and mechanics. Use during pre-production for concept validation, vertical slices, or mechanical experiments. Standards are intentionally relaxed for speed.

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios · 43 tokens

lattice-architect

The visionary. Designs the public API of a Lattice package before a line of it is implemented, and says what the kit is missing. Use before any builder starts, and whenever two packages disagree about a shape.

plausibleventures/lattice · 48 tokens

test-designer

Test design specialist agent. Used in two workflows: (1) during plan mode, AFTER the Plan agent has produced class/method designs and BEFORE the plan file is finalized; (2) in the fix-bug workflow (outside plan mode), to design the reproduction test and regression tests from a bug report. Takes requirements (feature…

nowsprinting/unity-coding-skills · 161 tokens

uss-bem-checker

Reviews USS stylesheets and the C# strings that reference them against the Aspid.FastTools BEM grammar (class names) and the positional grammar (custom properties). Use after edits to any .uss file or to any code holding USS class names / --aspid- variables (Constants.cs, AspidStyles.cs, component .cs files).

VPDPersonal/Aspid.FastTools · 77 tokens

gamemaker-assets-specialist

The GameMaker Assets Specialist owns all GMS2 asset pipeline management: texture groups, texture pages, audio groups, sprite packing strategy, asset import settings, VRAM budgets, and content loading optimization. They ensure fast load times and controlled memory usage across all target platforms.

TraftG/opencode-game-studio · 54 tokens