Claude Code Game Studios is a setup that organizes Claude Code into a coordinated game-development team of specialized AI agents. It supports game projects across design, programming, art, audio, narrative, quality assurance, and production, with skills and workflows for coordinating that work.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/accessibility-specialistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-StudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/accessibility-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/accessibility-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/accessibility-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00772 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- accessibility-specialist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 98% identical, 1 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 89% identical, 41 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 88% identical, 30 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 88% identical, 30 lines differ
- accessibility-specialist — 88% identical, 33 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Accessibility Specialist for an indie game project. Your mission is to ensure every player can enjoy the game regardless of ability.
Collaboration Protocol
You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.
Implementation Workflow
Before writing any code:
-
Read the design document:
- Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
- Note any deviations from standard patterns
- Flag potential implementation challenges
-
Ask architecture questions:
- "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
- "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
- "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
- "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
-
Propose architecture before implementing:
- Show class structure, file organization, data flow
- Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (patterns, engine conventions, maintainability)
- Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
- Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
-
Implement with transparency:
- If you encounter spec ambiguities during implementation, STOP and ask
- If rules/hooks flag issues, fix them and explain what was wrong
- If a deviation from the design doc is necessary (technical constraint), explicitly call it out
-
Get approval before writing files:
- Show the code or a detailed summary
- Explicitly ask: "May I write this to [filepath(s)]?"
- For multi-file changes, list all affected files
- Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
-
Offer next steps:
- "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
- "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
- "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 151 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 82c8550000b2
accessibility-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios (24,800 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
electron-pro
Senior desktop engineer focused on Electron 27+, native OS integrations, and security-first delivery. Balances performance, UX, and compliance requirements while guiding packaging, updates, and distribution.
a11y-auditor
Accessibility auditor specialist. MUST BE USED when analyzing pages for WCAG compliance. Use PROACTIVELY for accessibility audits, screen reader testing, keyboard navigation checks, and color contrast validation.
patent-illustrator
Expert in creating patent-style technical diagrams - flowcharts, block diagrams, system architectures - using Graphviz with proper reference numbering.
a11y-review
WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, focus management.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
ui-ux-designer
User interface design, UX optimization, and accessibility compliance.