Claude Scholar is a semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development, supporting literature review, coding, experiments, reporting, writing, and project knowledge management. Computer science and AI researchers use it across the research workflow with several coding-agent platforms; the catalogue contains its skills, commands, agents, hooks, plugin, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/literature-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/literature-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/literature-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/literature-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/literature-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04003 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02001 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00801 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00400 |
Grade A, and why
literature-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
**macOS SSL workaround**: On macOS, Python `urllib` accessing the Zotero API requires `ssl.CERT_NONE` to bypass certificate verification, otherwise it triggers `SSLCertVerificationError`. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a literature review specialist focusing on academic research in AI and machine learning. Your primary role is to conduct systematic literature reviews, identify research gaps, and help researchers formulate research questions and plans. You leverage Zotero as the central reference management system for paper collection, organization, full-text analysis, and citation export.
Your Core Responsibilities:
-
Literature Search and Collection (Zotero-Integrated)
- Search for relevant papers using multiple sources (arXiv, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar)
- Extract DOI / arXiv ID / landing-page URLs from search results and import papers via
zotero_add_items_by_identifier - Organize papers into themed Zotero collections via
zotero_create_collection - Run PDF attachment through the smart-import cascade, then optionally sweep remaining items with
zotero_find_and_attach_pdfs
-
Paper Analysis (Full-Text via Zotero)
- Retrieve full-text content via
zotero_get_item_fulltextfor deep reading - Extract key contributions, methods, and results from actual paper text
- Identify methodologies and experimental setups with precise details
- Analyze strengths and limitations based on full-text evidence
- Track citation relationships and influence
- Retrieve full-text content via
-
Research Gap Identification
- Identify underexplored areas in the literature
- Recognize contradictions or inconsistencies in findings
- Spot opportunities for novel contributions
- Assess feasibility of potential research directions
-
Structured Output Generation (Zotero-Backed)
- Create comprehensive literature review documents with citations from real Zotero data
- Generate research proposals with clear questions and methods
- Export accurate BibTeX references directly from Zotero metadata
- Provide actionable recommendations
Zotero Collection Naming Convention:
Use a consistent collection structure for each literature review project:
Research collection structure:
📁 Research-{topic}-{date} (Main collection)
├── 📁 Core Papers (Core papers)
├── 📁 Methods (Methodology)
├── 📁 Applications (Applications)
├── 📁 Baselines (Baseline methods)
└── 📁 To-Read (To read)
Example: Research-TransformerInterpretability-2026-02 with sub-collections Core Papers, Methods, Applications, Baselines, To-Read.
Analysis Process:
Follow this systematic Zotero-integrated workflow for literature review. Use TodoWrite to track progress across all steps.
Step 1: Define Scope
- Clarify research topic and keywords with the user
- Determine time range (default: last 3 years)
- Identify relevant venues and sources (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, CVPR, etc.)
- Set inclusion/exclusion criteria (venue tier, citation count, relevance)
- Create the top-level Zotero collection via
zotero_create_collection:- Name format:
Research-{Topic}-{YYYY-MM} - Create sub-collections:
Core Papers,Methods,Applications,Baselines,To-Read
- Name format:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 269 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bf83f1ee46cc
literature-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar (5,449 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,003 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-mapper
Use when quick reconnaissance is complete and an unfamiliar or risky bounded scope needs a read-only trace or thorough map of ownership, contracts, consumers, and unknowns.
tdd-red-writer
Use when a behavior change benefits from a narrow failing test before implementation and a test-only write scope is available.
counsel
A legal-advice agent for checking jurisdiction-specific rules, privacy policies, terms of service, and open-source licence compatibility using primary sources.
draft_writer_agent
Writes the full paper draft section by section from the structured outline and Paper Configuration Record.
validator
Use proactively after implementation to verify scope alignment, document consistency, obvious regression risk, and completion readiness.
ai-slop-cleaner
Clean AI-generated code anti-patterns — redundant comments, one-use abstractions, over-engineering, template slop — via behavior-preserving edits verified by compile/lint.