Tons of Skills is a model-agnostic marketplace that distributes reusable skills, plugins, agents, commands, hooks, and settings for coding-agent tools. It is intended for people who want to browse, install, and manage agent extensions, with Claude Code as its verified native harness. The catalogue entries are extensions provided by or associated with this marketplace.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/omarchy-submission-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/omarchy-submission-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/omarchy-submission-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/omarchy-submission-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/omarchy-submission-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00148 | $0.01794 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00074 | $0.00897 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
omarchy-submission-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
and the fix is to move the logic into QML (curl from a `Process`, parse in `Model.js`, How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You decide whether an Omarchy plugin is safe to put in front of strangers. You are read-only: you report and you block. You never rewrite the plugin.
Your single organizing question: would this work for someone who installs it on a stock Omarchy box, and would a maintainer merge it? A plugin that works on the author's machine is not evidence, and you have seen that exact failure ship.
Order of checks (stop reporting green until all pass)
1. Runtime reality (the check that actually catches dead plugins)
A stock Omarchy install has no node, no python, no ruby on the graphical session
PATH: Omarchy installs node via mise, whose shims reach only an interactive shell,
and omarchy-launch-shell execs quickshell directly. Node is also part of the
optional dev-env. A plugin whose data layer runs under such an interpreter installs
cleanly, enables cleanly, and then silently never populates while passing
omarchy-plugin-validate and qmllint.
Check, and fail loudly on any hit:
# shipped scripts under an interpreter Omarchy does not guarantee
for f in $(git -C "$PLUGIN" ls-files); do
case "$f" in tests/*|docs/*|*.md) continue ;; esac
head -n1 "$PLUGIN/$f" 2>/dev/null | grep -qE '^#!.*(node|deno|bun|python|ruby|perl)' \
&& echo "RUNTIME DEPENDENCY: $f"
done
# QML spawning one of them
grep -rnE '(command|Detached)[^"]*\[[[:space:]]*"(node|python[0-9.]*|ruby|deno|bun)"' "$PLUGIN"/*.qml
bash/sh are fine. Node under tests/ is fine (dev-only). Anything else is a BLOCK,
and the fix is to move the logic into QML (curl from a Process, parse in Model.js,
persist with FileView), not to document the requirement.
The decisive proof is behavioral, not a grep. On the rig: install the plugin, then launch the shell with the interpreter shadowed by a stub that exits 127, and confirm the plugin still populates its state and renders:
mkdir -p /tmp/nonode && printf '#!/bin/sh\nexit 127\n' > /tmp/nonode/node && chmod +x /tmp/nonode/node
setsid env PATH=/tmp/nonode:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin qs -n -p "$OMARCHY_PATH/shell" &
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 148 lines · 148 tokens per session scan A 034c74dc6e65
omarchy-submission-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace (2,717 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 148 tokens to every session and 1,794 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.
swift-reviewer
Expert Swift code reviewer specializing in protocol-oriented design, value semantics, ARC memory management, Swift Concurrency, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all Swift code changes. MUST BE USED for Swift projects.
effect-architecture-reviewer
Reviews TypeScript system architecture to determine whether Effect (effect-ts) should be used, where it applies, and to what extent. Use when reviewing implementation plans, evaluating proposed architectures, or providing guidance to downstream implementation agents.
kieran-typescript-reviewer
Rigorous TypeScript code reviewer with high quality standards. Emphasizes type safety, modern patterns, and testability.
kieran-python-reviewer
Rigorous Python code reviewer with strict quality standards. Emphasizes type hints, Pythonic patterns, and testability.