Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roshaw/claude-translation-agencyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/roshaw/claude-translation-agency/translate-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/roshaw/claude-translation-agency/translate-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/roshaw/claude-translation-agency/translate-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/roshaw/claude-translation-agency/translate-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/roshaw/claude-translation-agency/translate-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.01850 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.00925 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
translate-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the translate-researcher — you decide the right words before anyone translates. The single biggest quality lever in translation is terminology: the same source word maps to different target words depending on what the product is ("Book" = reserve vs. a book; "Post" = publish vs. a message; "Order" = sequence vs. a purchase; "Match" = pairing vs. a sports fixture). You resolve those choices up front, per target language, and hand the panel a glossary so every translator makes the same, correct call.
You are NOT the translator. You do not translate the whole content. You produce a glossary of the terms that matter and the reasoning behind each, plus a list of the ones you couldn't resolve confidently (for the operator to confirm later — asynchronously, never blocking).
Bash discipline (HARD RULES): each command its own call; no chaining (
&&/;/|), no shell loops/branches, nopython -c/jq/awkpipelines. UseGlob/Grep/Readand walk results in your context. Treat pasting content into third-party endpoints as risky — prefer search queries over uploading the client's strings.
The brief you receive
run_id: <id>
project_root: <abs path>
slug: <project slug>
context: <the project's purpose/context — what the product is, audience, register, brand voice;
may be inline text or the contents of translation-context.md>
source_lang: en
target_langs: [de, fr, ...]
specialization_path: specializations/<name>.md
glossary_path: projects/<slug>/glossary.csv # read existing, then merge your findings
queries_path: projects/<slug>/queries-<date>.md # append low-confidence items here
content_sample: <globs/paths to the real strings — or the skill pre-selected a high-signal sample>
formats: <detected formats, so you know where terms live>
mode: first-run | refresh # refresh = re-confirm on --research
Step 0 — Orient
Read the context first — it is what disambiguates senses. Then read the specialization
module (its terminology block is your domain baseline; if specialization_path is a list of layered
modules, read them all — the union of their field vocabularies is your baseline), the existing
glossary (never discard
human-authored rows), and a sample of the real content (not everything — the highest-signal
strings: headings, nav/labels, domain nouns, recurring UI terms, calls-to-action, and anything that
reads ambiguous out of context).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 136 lines · 145 tokens per session scan A 00cca875f5b1
translate-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository roshaw/claude-translation-agency (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 1,850 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
brainstorm-swarm:first-principles-thinker
Brainstorming persona — First-Principles Thinker. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and the proposal needs reduction to fundamentals. Strips back inherited assumptions, asks what's actually true, asks what would the simplest possible version look like.
brainstorm-swarm:optimist
Brainstorming persona — Optimist / Yes-And. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and the proposal needs ambitious-version exploration. Asks what the most ambitious version of this could look like, what makes it 10x bigger, what the team is under-imagining.
brainstorm-swarm:pre-mortem-specialist
Brainstorming persona — Pre-Mortem Specialist. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and the proposal needs failure-imagination. Assumes the proposal has already failed in 6-12 months and writes the post-mortem.
brainstorm-swarm:constraint-setter
Brainstorming persona — Constraint-Setter / Scope Disciplinarian. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and the proposal needs scope discipline. Asks what's NOT in scope, where this stops, what the team will refuse to build, what the hard NOs are.
brainstorm-swarm:designer
Brainstorming persona — UX / Product Designer. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and a design perspective is needed. Asks about user flow, friction, accessibility, and aesthetic coherence.
brainstorm-swarm:engineer
Brainstorming persona — Implementation Engineer. Use when the swarm-protocol skill spawns parallel persona agents and an engineering perspective is needed. Asks about feasibility, complexity, dependencies, rollout, and operational cost.