Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zebbern/termstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zebbern/termstack/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zebbern/termstack/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zebbern/termstack/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zebbern/termstack/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zebbern/termstack/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- `exec("ls " + userInput)`, `os.system(f"ping {host}")`, `child_process.exec(cmd)` The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A f9197ddcaf83
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zebbern/termstack (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Generic code review — layers, error handling, naming, DI, SQL safety, auth, tests.
ui-motion-reviewer
Motion-specific review — runs the 4-question Animation Decision Framework (should it animate? purpose? easing? duration?), catches ease-in on UI, transition:all, scale(0) entry, bounce/elastic defaults, animations on keyboard-triggered actions, prefers-reduced-motion gaps, and poorly-chosen spring vs duration…
docs-reviewer
Documentation review — freshness check (git diff vs docs) + accuracy validation (claims vs code) + coverage audit.
code-reviewer
Expert code reviewer. Proactively reviews code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use after implementing features or fixing bugs to ensure code quality.
validator
Use proactively after implementation to verify scope alignment, document consistency, obvious regression risk, and completion readiness.
security-reviewer
Security reviewer - performs security audit focusing on auth, input validation, data protection, and dependency security.