Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to outlmd/outl. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/outlmd/outl/main/.claude/commands/check.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/outlmd/outlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/outlmd/outl/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/outlmd/outl/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/outlmd/outl/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/outlmd/outl/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/outlmd/outl/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00523 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run in sequence and report the result of each step:
cargo fmt --all -- --check— formattingcargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings— lintscargo test --workspace --all-targets— testsRUSTDOCFLAGS="-D warnings" cargo doc --workspace --no-deps— docs (CI runs this; breaks on intra-doc links to private items, e.g.[`Foo`]whereFooispub(crate). Drop the brackets:`Foo`.)bun run test— vitest across every package declaring the script (@outl/shared,outl-desktop,outl-mobile)bun run typecheck—tsc --noEmitacross every package declaring it, which is those three plus theexamples/*plugins (14 today)
Steps 5 and 6 are not optional extras: roughly a third of every GUI client is TypeScript, and several Rust invariants are enforced only on the TS side.
shortcuts.support.test.ts is the desktop half of invariant 12 (a catalog that promises a chord no handler implements), and the theme suites are the client half of invariant 13.
Reporting "done" on a Rust-only run leaves those unverified.
Both are fast — the full vitest fan-out is ~4s — so there is no reason to skip them.
If bun is missing, say so explicitly rather than silently reporting a Rust-only pass as a full one.
If any step fails, stop and show the exact output. Do not attempt to fix automatically — only report.
Output format:
fmt: PASS | FAIL (N files)
clippy: PASS | FAIL (N warnings)
test: PASS | FAIL (N failures)
doc: PASS | FAIL (N warnings)
vitest: PASS | FAIL (N failures)
typecheck: PASS | FAIL (N errors)
[failure details, if any]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines · +12 tokens per session db69979b1fe3
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 811040f2c227
check is a command published in the GitHub repository outlmd/outl (222 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 523 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other commands, from other repositories
develop-staged-tdd
Orchestrate multi-agent staged development with TDD and quality gates.
coverage
Add test coverage to existing code.
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
debate-replay
Deterministically replay a past debate from a session snapshot — regression tests the deliberation engine.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
flowspec.validate
../../templates/commands/flow/validate.md.