Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine/growth-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine/growth-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine/growth-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine/growth-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine/growth-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00925 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00463 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
growth-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/growth-plan
The prescription pass for $1 (defaults to the active project, resolve with
./bin/mkt config show). Where /discovery-audit answers "where do we stand," this answers "so what
do we build to win, in what order, to get on top of the competition." It runs the opportunity-map
skill over the diagnostic evidence and produces research/opportunity-map.md: a sized opportunity map,
a capture plan with a chosen mechanism per opportunity, and a flank-then-moat takeover thesis.
This is the step the framework used to do only when a brief forced it. Now it is standard: every engagement gets a ranked, mechanism-driven, falsifiable plan, not just a diagnosis.
Steps
-
Load context + evidence.
./bin/mkt config show --project $1. Readclient.yml(the goal, the competitor set, DR/market) and everything already inprojects/$1/research/: competitor analysis, keyword map, geo-audit / ai-citation-log, technical audit, backlinks, VOC. If the diagnostics are thin, run/discovery-audit $1first (or at leastcompetitor-analysis+keyword-research+geo-audit). -
Run
opportunity-map(methodology:playbooks/opportunity-capture.md):- Discover the four gaps (demand, AI-citation, format, segment). Fill missing evidence with
live pulls: Ahrefs keyword-gap + competitor organic keywords + KD/DR (budget-aware, save to
data/), and theweb-researchprobe for GEO open fields and competitor facts. - Size and rank each cluster Demand x Winnability x Fit; label Greenfield / Contested / Fortress / Trap. Use GA4/GSC to sanity-check fit where access exists; otherwise flag fit as an assumption to validate.
- Pick one capture mechanism per opportunity (programmatic SEO, comparison hub, GEO/AEO play, free tool, education cluster, refresh, local, earned mentions), on evidence not habit. Flag any cluster that depends on data the client does not have as a build-blocker.
- Sequence the takeover flank-then-moat: quick wins -> beachhead expansion -> compounding moat (brand demand, proprietary data/tools, earned authority). Name the ONE competitor you flank and the weakness you exploit; state what you deliberately do NOT attack (the fortress) and why.
- Discover the four gaps (demand, AI-citation, format, segment). Fill missing evidence with
live pulls: Ahrefs keyword-gap + competitor organic keywords + KD/DR (budget-aware, save to
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 59 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 117bb8d2e6a6
growth-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository prashishh/seo-geo-report-engine (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 925 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
seo-geo
SEO/GEO end-to-end along the SITE loop: survey demand and competitors, implement content, tune quality/tech/on-page, and evaluate authority/rankings/reports/memory (--phase survey|implement|tune|evaluate). Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
narrative
Run a brand-narrative & messaging (TALE) workflow: trace the current message and positioning truth, architect the durable message house/voice/story canon, land it consistently across every surface, and evaluate resonance with tests and drift monitoring. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
social
Run an organic-social (ECHO) workflow: channel portfolio and voice dossiers, platform-native content and calendars, the social-quality gate with a pre-publish go/no-go, community/inbox/crisis operations, and the listening/SOV/dark-social measurement loop. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
ad
Run a paid-ads (ROAS) workflow: audience segments, account structure, ad creative, experiment design, pre-launch signal QA + the account-audit gate, measurement, and attribution. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
Run an email-marketing (SEND) workflow: deliverability/consent setup, segmentation, email creative, lifecycle flows, newsletter monetization, send-testing, and the email-quality audit gate. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
influencer
Run an influencer-marketing (STAR) workflow: audience & creator scouting, campaign targeting, briefs, outreach, amplification, and ROI reporting. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.