style-brief

style-brief is a command for Claude Code from sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins. It costs 19 tokens per session (351 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that creates a short visual plan for a game concept, covering its look, colors, shapes, references, and production needs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define style keywords, color choices, shape rules, references to study, styles to avoid, and a first art test.
Why use it?
It gives a team a shared visual direction before significant art work begins.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the art plugin — 2 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to define style keywords, color choices, shape rules, references to study, styles to avoid, and a first art test.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install art, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for style-brief

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for style-brief

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/style-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 351 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.00351
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00176
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00070
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00035

Measured 9d ago against content hash c09b55b74a6c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

style-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/art/commands/style-brief.md · 58 lines

What it actually says

Art Style Brief Generator

Create a rapid art style brief from a game concept.

Output Format

# Art Style Brief: [Game Title]

## Visual Identity in One Sentence
[Capture the entire visual approach in one sentence]

## Style Keywords
[5 adjectives that describe the visual style]

## Color Direction
### Primary Palette
- **Dominant:** [Color] - [What it represents]
- **Accent:** [Color] - [When used]
- **Neutral:** [Color] - [Base tones]

### Mood Mapping
| Mood | Colors |
|------|--------|
| [Mood 1] | [Colors] |
| [Mood 2] | [Colors] |

## Shape Language
- **Heroes/Allies:** [Shapes] - [Why]
- **Threats/Enemies:** [Shapes] - [Why]
- **Environment:** [Shapes] - [Why]

## Reference Touchstones
| Reference | What to Take |
|-----------|-------------|
| [Game/Film/Art] | [Specific element] |
| [Game/Film/Art] | [Specific element] |
| [Game/Film/Art] | [Specific element] |

## What We're NOT
[Styles or approaches to explicitly avoid]

## Production Considerations
- **Complexity:** [Low/Medium/High]
- **Team Size:** [Solo/Small/Large]
- **Key Challenge:** [Main production concern]

## First Art Test
[What single image would prove/disprove this style works]

Generate based on user's game concept.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 58 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A c09b55b74a6c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

style-brief is a command published in the GitHub repository sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins (15 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 351 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.