Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/striderza/opencodegamestudios/ux-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/striderza/opencodegamestudios/ux-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/striderza/opencodegamestudios/ux-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/striderza/opencodegamestudios/ux-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00035 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00017 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
ux-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invokes /ux-review skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 9 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 635f777d413d
ux-review is a command published in the GitHub repository striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios (83 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 35 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
accessibility-pass
Review accessibility coverage for input, readability, audio, and difficulty options against design intent.
art-3d-pass
Review 3D art assets for export conventions, rigs, animation clips, materials, lighting, and LOD compliance.
cert-check
Review the current state against certification and platform compliance expectations.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
accessibility-audit
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct comprehensive audits, identify barriers, provide remediation guidance, and ensure digital products are accessible to all users.
input-review
Review input handling, device coverage, buffering, and control responsiveness from an engine-neutral perspective.