Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/creative-phase-metricsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alkoleft/platform-context-exporterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/creative-phase-metrics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/creative-phase-metrics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/creative-phase-metrics.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00744 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
creative-phase-metrics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to creative-phase-metrics — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CREATIVE PHASE METRICS
TL;DR: This document defines comprehensive quality metrics and measurement criteria for creative phases, ensuring that design decisions meet required standards and are properly documented.
📊 METRICS OVERVIEW
graph TD
subgraph "CREATIVE PHASE METRICS"
M1["Documentation<br>Quality"]
M2["Decision<br>Coverage"]
M3["Option<br>Analysis"]
M4["Impact<br>Assessment"]
M5["Verification<br>Score"]
end
M1 --> Score["Quality<br>Score"]
M2 --> Score
M3 --> Score
M4 --> Score
M5 --> Score
style M1 fill:#4dbb5f,stroke:#36873f,color:white
style M2 fill:#ffa64d,stroke:#cc7a30,color:white
style M3 fill:#d94dbb,stroke:#a3378a,color:white
style M4 fill:#4dbbbb,stroke:#368787,color:white
style M5 fill:#d971ff,stroke:#a33bc2,color:white
style Score fill:#ff71c2,stroke:#c23b8a,color:white
📋 QUALITY METRICS SCORECARD
# Creative Phase Quality Assessment
## 1. Documentation Quality [0-10]
- [ ] Clear problem statement (2 points)
- [ ] Well-defined objectives (2 points)
- [ ] Comprehensive requirements list (2 points)
- [ ] Proper formatting and structure (2 points)
- [ ] Cross-references to related documents (2 points)
## 2. Decision Coverage [0-10]
- [ ] All required decisions identified (2 points)
- [ ] Each decision point documented (2 points)
- [ ] Dependencies mapped (2 points)
- [ ] Impact analysis included (2 points)
- [ ] Future considerations noted (2 points)
## 3. Option Analysis [0-10]
- [ ] Multiple options considered (2 points)
- [ ] Pros/cons documented (2 points)
- [ ] Technical feasibility assessed (2 points)
- [ ] Resource requirements estimated (2 points)
- [ ] Risk factors identified (2 points)
## 4. Impact Assessment [0-10]
- [ ] System impact documented (2 points)
- [ ] Performance implications assessed (2 points)
- [ ] Security considerations addressed (2 points)
- [ ] Maintenance impact evaluated (2 points)
- [ ] Cost implications analyzed (2 points)
## 5. Verification Score [0-10]
- [ ] Requirements traced (2 points)
- [ ] Constraints validated (2 points)
- [ ] Test scenarios defined (2 points)
- [ ] Review feedback incorporated (2 points)
- [ ] Final verification completed (2 points)
Total Score: [Sum of all categories] / 50
Minimum Required Score: 40/50 (80%)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 195 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1fec994d48b1
creative-phase-metrics is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository alkoleft/platform-context-exporter (48 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,488 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to creative-phase-metrics, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
bsl-ssl
Переиспользование БСП, разметка правок типовых модулей, устаревшие объекты.
edt-form-xml-requirements
Требования EDT к XML-формам (Form.form): extInfo, дефолты полей.
1c-report-direct-query
Прямой запрос в отчётах 1С (СКД) без схемы компоновки.
1c-transactions-and-locks
Транзакции и управляемые блокировки: шаблон, порядок захвата.
async-methods-1c
Асинхронные методы 1С: Асинх/Ждать/Обещание (8.3.18+).
query-optimization-tips
Оптимизация запросов 1С: ВЫРАЗИТЬ, ВТ, индексы.