Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools/jsdoc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools/jsdoc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools/jsdoc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools/jsdoc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools/jsdoc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00644 | $0.00644 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00258 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00129 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
jsdoc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
JSDoc
Общие правила
- Язык комментариев: русский (как в code-style и project-context).
- Документировать все экспортируемые сущности: функции, классы, методы, интерфейсы, типы, константы.
- Для внутренних (не экспортируемых) функций и типов — краткий JSDoc при неочевидном назначении.
- Файл: в начале модуля — один блок JSDoc с описанием назначения модуля (если не однострочный комментарий).
Формат
- Функция/метод: описание в одну строку или короткий абзац; при наличии параметров или возвращаемого значения — теги
@paramи@returns. - Класс: назначение класса и откуда берутся параметры (например env, конфиг).
- Интерфейс/тип: одно предложение о назначении и ключевых полях.
- Константа/объект: что представляет (например «Уровни логирования», «Схема параметров инструментов»).
Теги
@param {Type} name — описание— для параметров (тип опционален при наличии TypeScript).@returns описание— для возвращаемого значения (при неочевидном или важном).- Не использовать
@descriptionотдельно — описание пишется в теле блока.
Примеры
/**
* Преобразует commandId расширения в имя MCP-инструмента (укладывается в лимит длины).
*
* @param commandId — полный идентификатор команды
* @returns имя инструмента для MCP
*/
export function commandIdToToolName(commandId: string): string { ... }
/** Настройки подключения к IPC-серверу (хост, порт, токен, таймаут). */
export interface IpcClientConfig { ... }
/**
* Выполняет JSON-RPC запрос к IPC-серверу.
*
* @param method — имя метода (например listCommands, executeCommand)
* @param params — опциональные параметры
* @returns результат из response.result (при ошибке — reject с сообщением сервера)
*/
public async request<T = unknown>(method: string, params?: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<T> { ... }
Что не дублировать
- Не повторять в JSDoc то, что уже однозначно видно из сигнатуры и имени (например «возвращает Promise» для async-функции), если нет уточнений.
- Тесты: достаточно файлового JSDoc при необходимости; описание сценария оставлять в
describe/it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 644 tokens per session scan A 2e9ba3f7bf4b
jsdoc is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools (40 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 644 tokens to every session, about $0.0026 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
1c-coding-standards
Coding standards for BSL, the programming language used by the 1C business software platform. They cover naming, method documentation, database queries, collections, client-server code, and performance practices.
code-review-checklist
A code-review checklist for 1C source files, including BSL and OS files. It groups findings by severity and checks issues such as security, performance, errors, access control, duplication, and maintainability.
bsl-ssl
A set of rules for developing 1C applications built on БСП, the Russian-language Standard Subsystems Library. It tells developers when to reuse library functionality, how to mark changes, and how to handle outdated objects.
bsp-profile-rights-api
Rules for creating and updating access-group profiles in БСП 3.x, the Standard Subsystems Library used by several 1C business applications. They explain how roles, permissions, users, and row-level access restrictions are represented in code.
edt-form-xml-requirements
A set of rules for XML form files used by EDT, a development environment for 1C business applications. It describes form details that the code generator does not add automatically.
sdd-workflow
A nine-phase Specification-Driven Development workflow for planning complex 1C software changes before writing code. 1C is a business software platform commonly used for accounting and enterprise operations.