Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yellow-hammer/namespace-forestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/namespace-forest/schemas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/namespace-forest/schemas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/namespace-forest/schemas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yellow-hammer/namespace-forest/schemas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yellow-hammer/namespace-forest/schemas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00257 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
schemas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago First seen · 13 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 148a02092f99
schemas is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository yellow-hammer/namespace-forest (15 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 257 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
archive-comprehensive
Comprehensive archiving approach for Level 4 Complex System tasks.
workflow-level3
Defines the standard workflow for Level 3 (Intermediate Feature) tasks, guiding through comprehensive planning, targeted creative design, structured implementation, detailed reflection, and feature-specific archiving.
plan-mode-map
Visual process map for PLAN mode (Code Implementation).
command-execution
Command execution guidelines for isolation-focused Memory Bank.
optimized-creative-template
Optimized creative phase template with progressive documentation.
main-optimized
Optimized main rule for improved token efficiency.