aaron-marketing-skills is a collection of 120 AI-agent skills covering marketing work such as brand narrative, search optimization, social media, email, advertising, influencer campaigns, and launches. Marketers and agent users can install it as a plugin, use its portable skills, or run its described bot team. The catalogue entries are components of this marketing workflow.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/advocacy-program-designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 69 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00167 | $0.03205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.01603 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00641 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
advocacy-program-designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Advocacy Program Designer
Blueprints employee-advocacy and founder-led share programs that survive the gate: real people, opted in, posting in their own words on their own schedule, disclosed. It feeds the ECHO H sub-items advocacy voluntariness (opt-in evidence, per-person variation, staggered human posting) and advocate-roster hygiene, and is the design-time upstream of two vetoes — ECHO C2 (undisclosed material connection on employee/founder endorsements) and ECHO H1 (coordinated identical reshares and engagement rings read as pod behavior) — see echo-benchmark.md. Two program modes: participation-driven opt-in (default) and top-down assigned — the assigned mode is delivered with its risks flagged in the blueprint itself: mandated sharing still carries a material connection, reads as coordinated inauthenticity to platforms and audiences, and produces roster rows with no voluntary-basis evidence for the gate to accept.
Scope guard: this skill designs the program and the kits only. It does NOT compute the ECHO profile result or run vetoes (that is social-quality-auditor), run 1:1 recruitment conversations (route to outreach-manager), or hold canonical person records — saved roster rows are minimal (advocate_ref, disclosure line, opt-in date, voluntary-basis evidence) and go to memory/events/channels.ndjson via an authorized operation: propose request to registry-events.py only; raw handles remain transient resolver/connector input. channel-registry is the sole writer of memory/channels/. An advocate becoming a paid creator leaves this program: creator-registry record plus contract-helper terms first. Paid creator campaigns are campaign-planner. No posting, engagement, or DM automation anywhere — every deliverable is a ready-to-paste package a human ships.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 90 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A 8e32f9999c48
advocacy-program-designer is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills (2,767 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 3,205 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
geo-visibility-check
One-shot GEO audit: does your brand appear in Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini answers for the buyer questions that matter? Runs a prompt panel through the engines with citation tracing and reports per-prompt verdicts, who wins instead, and which sources the answers come from.
geo-optimizer-skill
Run geo audit first. It scores the site 0–100 across 8 categories and generates a prioritized action list.
geo-loop
Run one bounded eGEOagents loop iteration over a workspace domain - read the charter and fresh collector data, do ONE unit of work, write substrate artifacts, append one Timeline entry and one LOG line. Use for loop mode, /geo:loop, scheduled GEO runs, or continuous monitoring.
content-scoring
Score content against the 10 GEO criteria with evidence and prioritized fixes. Use when users ask to score, rate, evaluate, or estimate ranking strength.
competitive-analysis
Analyze AI-search competitors for a query and recommend ranking strategy. Use when users ask competitor analysis, who ranks, or competitive landscape.
schema-generator
Generate JSON-LD schema markup for pages and content types with an implementation checklist. Use when users ask for schema, structured data, rich snippets, or markup.