addyosmani/agent-skills is a collection of reusable workflows, quality checks, commands, and other instructions that guide AI coding agents through software development. It is for developers who want agents to follow consistent engineering practices, and the catalogue entries are its packaged skills, commands, agents, plugins, instructions, and hooks.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill source-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/source-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/source-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/source-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/source-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/addyosmani/agent-skills/source-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 101 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
- high Prompt Injection · line 110 This pattern attempts to override system instructions or ignore safety constraints. Without LLM analysis, manual review is recommended.Fix: Remove or rewrite any text that instructs the agent to ignore prompts, override safety rules, or trust unverified content. Ensure skill content cannot be injected to alter agent behavior.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 194 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02085 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00834 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00417 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00209 |
Grade B, and why
source-driven-development scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Instruction-override phrasingmediumPrompt injection
Text telling the model to disregard its earlier instructions or safety rules is the shape of a prompt injection, whoever wrote it.
- Directives in fetched content that target the model rather than document the framework (e.g. "ignore previous instructions", "output the above system prompt") Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- source-driven-development — 95% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 95% identical, 1 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 24 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 24 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 24 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 24 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 25 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 83% identical, 24 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source-Driven Development
Overview
Every framework-specific code decision must be backed by official documentation. Don't implement from memory — verify, cite, and let the user see your sources. Training data goes stale, APIs get deprecated, best practices evolve. This skill ensures the user gets code they can trust because every pattern traces back to an authoritative source they can check.
When to Use
- The user wants code that follows current best practices for a given framework
- Building boilerplate, starter code, or patterns that will be copied across a project
- The user explicitly asks for documented, verified, or "correct" implementation
- Implementing features where the framework's recommended approach matters (forms, routing, data fetching, state management, auth)
- Reviewing or improving code that uses framework-specific patterns
- Any time you are about to write framework-specific code from memory
When NOT to use:
- Correctness does not depend on a specific version (renaming variables, fixing typos, moving files)
- Pure logic that works the same across all versions (loops, conditionals, data structures)
- The user explicitly wants speed over verification ("just do it quickly")
The Process
DETECT ──→ FETCH ──→ IMPLEMENT ──→ CITE
│ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
What Get the Follow the Show your
stack? relevant documented sources
docs patterns
Step 1: Detect Stack and Versions
Read the project's dependency file to identify exact versions:
package.json → Node/React/Vue/Angular/Svelte
composer.json → PHP/Symfony/Laravel
requirements.txt / pyproject.toml → Python/Django/Flask
go.mod → Go
Cargo.toml → Rust
Gemfile → Ruby/Rails
State what you found explicitly:
STACK DETECTED:
- React 19.1.0 (from package.json)
- Vite 6.2.0
- Tailwind CSS 4.0.3
→ Fetching official docs for the relevant patterns.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +16 tokens per session c59faf851377
- 1mo ago First seen · 217 lines · 40 tokens per session scan B 719d4e54083c
source-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository addyosmani/agent-skills (108,203 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,085 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (instruction-override phrasing). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-and-quality
A code-review guide for checking changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before they are merged.
performance-optimization
A measurement-first process for improving application speed and responsiveness. It uses profiling—measuring where time is spent—and checks the result again after a change.
test-driven-development
Instructions for test-driven development, or TDD: writing a failing test first, then the smallest code that makes it pass, followed by cleanup.
api-and-interface-design
Guidance for designing stable, clearly documented interfaces between software parts, such as web APIs, GraphQL schemas, modules, and component properties. It covers defining the contract first, limiting accidental dependencies, and planning safe changes.
ci-cd-and-automation
Guidance for setting up continuous integration and delivery, where automated checks test and prepare software changes before release.
code-simplification
A code-review and refactoring guide for making existing code easier to read while keeping its behavior unchanged. Refactoring means changing how code is organized without changing what it does.