AutoResearchClaw is a system that turns a research idea into a scientific paper through autonomous and collaborative AI research workflows. It is for researchers who want agents to investigate questions, run experiments, and produce papers, with optional human guidance. Catalogue skills and agents provide parts of its research workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw --skill systematic-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/systematic-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/systematic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/systematic-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/systematic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/systematic-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00238 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Systematic Review Best Practice
Follow PRISMA-like methodology for literature search:
- Define clear inclusion/exclusion criteria BEFORE searching
- Use multiple databases (Semantic Scholar, arXiv, OpenAlex)
- Search with both broad and narrow queries
- Screen by title/abstract first, then full text
- Extract: method, dataset, metrics, key findings
- Synthesize gaps and opportunities, not just summaries
- Prioritize recent (last 2-3 years) high-citation papers
- Include at least one seminal/foundational paper per sub-topic
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 812ad3e14141
systematic-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw (14,375 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 238 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
clawmobile-trace-induction
Record or summarize a ClawMobile demonstration and save a validated reusable skill candidate draft.
clawmobile-capabilities
Capability-stage map for the ClawMobile Termux runtime.
TweetClaw X Source Context
Use this skill when an Atlarix workflow needs grounded X/Twitter context before it drafts, reviews, monitors, or plans social work. TweetClaw is the OpenClaw plugin for X/Twitter automation through the @xquik/tweetclaw npm package.
clawmobile-policy
Reference policy for complex ClawMobile Termux runtime recovery, generated-skill execution, and capability boundaries. Routine UI lookup should follow AGENTS/TOOLS without reading this skill.
tmux
Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.
summarize
Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files (great fallback for “transcribe this YouTube/video”).