Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to appautomaton/latex-arxiv-SKILL. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-SKILL/main/.codex/skills/arxiv-paper-writer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-SKILLWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-skill/arxiv-paper-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-skill/arxiv-paper-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-skill/arxiv-paper-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-skill/arxiv-paper-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appautomaton/latex-arxiv-skill/arxiv-paper-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 154 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.02324 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01162 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00465 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv-paper-writer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
**Conventions**: run `python3 scripts/...` from this skill folder (where `scripts/` lives); `<paper_dir>` is the paper/project root (contains `main.tex`, `ref.bib`, `plan/`, `issues/`, `notes/`). Paths like `plan/...` ar How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ML/AI Review Paper Workflow (IEEEtran template)
When to Use
- ML/AI review papers for arXiv (main text ~6-10 pages; references excluded)
- LaTeX + BibTeX workflow with verified citations
- Citation validation/repair on existing LaTeX projects
When NOT to Use
- Novel experimental research papers (this is a review workflow)
- Non-academic documents
Inputs
- Topic description (required)
- Constraints: venue, page limit, author/affiliations (optional)
- Existing project path for citation validation (optional)
Outputs
main.tex(LaTeX source)ref.bib(verified BibTeX entries)IEEEtran.clsplan/<timestamp>-<slug>.md,issues/<timestamp>-<slug>.csv- Figures/tables;
main.pdf notes/research-snapshot.md(Gate 0 research snapshot)notes/literature-notes.md(optional per-citation notes)notes/arxiv-registry.sqlite3(arXiv metadata/BibTeX cache)
Conventions: run python3 scripts/... from this skill folder (where scripts/ lives); <paper_dir> is the paper/project root (contains main.tex, ref.bib, plan/, issues/, notes/). Paths like plan/... are under <paper_dir>. Papers are created under --out <workspace_dir> (your working directory, never inside this skill folder); pass the same --out (and --name, if used) to both bootstrap stages. For arXiv discovery/metadata/BibTeX, use scripts/arxiv_registry.py (no ad-hoc curl/wget).
Gated Workflow
Tip: Run
python3 scripts/<script>.py --helpbefore use. Open reference files only when a step calls them out.
Non-Negotiable Rules
- No prose in
main.texuntil plan approved AND issues CSV exists. - First deliverable: research snapshot + outline + clarification questions + draft plan.
- Use plan + issues tracking for all new papers; do not opt out.
- Issues CSV is the execution contract; update
StatusandVerified_Citationsper issue, and add/split/insert issue rows when scope grows (do not do untracked work). - Template is fixed: use IEEEtran two-column layout (
assets/template/IEEEtran.cls). Treat two-column width as a layout constraint (use two-column floats when needed).
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/literature-notes-template.md 981 B
- assets/paper-issues-template.csv 783 B
- assets/paper-plan-template.md 1.9 KB
- assets/template/IEEEtran.cls 275 KB
- assets/template/main.template.tex 10 KB
- assets/template/references.template.bib 7.8 KB
- references/bibtex-guide.md 1.2 KB
- references/citation-workflow.md 1.6 KB
- references/quality-report.md 1.7 KB
- references/research-workflow.md 2.2 KB
- references/template-usage.md 726 B
- references/visual-templates.md 1.2 KB
- references/writing-style.md 798 B
- scripts/arxiv_registry.py 38 KB runs code
- scripts/bootstrap_ieee_review_paper.py 7.1 KB runs code
- scripts/compile_paper.py 6.5 KB runs code
- scripts/create_paper_plan.py 8.5 KB runs code
- scripts/paper_utils.py 4.3 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_paper_issues.py 5.5 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 177 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 2553d9c0bcd4
arxiv-paper-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository appautomaton/latex-arxiv-SKILL (428 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,324 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
arithmetic-evaluator
Evaluate arithmetic expressions and return numeric results. Use when a user asks an arithmetic question, requests calculation, or provides a math expression involving numbers, parentheses, and arithmetic operators.
aaai-reproducibility
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across…
acl-experiments
Use when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP…
acl-reproducibility
Use when strengthening reproducibility evidence for an ACL paper reviewed through ACL Rolling Review, covering the Responsible NLP checklist end to end, hyperparameter and compute reporting, prompt and decoding disclosure for LLM experiments, data contamination auditing, variance across runs, and checklist-to-paper…
aaai-experiments
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.
acmmm-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the experiments of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — matched baselines per modality, ablations that isolate the cross-modal fusion, user studies or QoE measurement where the claim is subjective, dataset and media licensing, and honest compute reporting, so evidence supports a multimedia…