Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add attilaszasz/sdd-pilot --skill sddp-devopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/attilaszasz/sdd-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-devops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-devops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-devops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-devops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-devops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00270 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
sddp-devops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Argument hint: [project description, infrastructure context, deployment constraints, or operations inputs]
Command category: project-bootstrap
Prerequisites: none
Create/refine canonical project-level deployment and operations context. Ignore feature-level implementation detail; focus on deployment, infrastructure, observability, reliability, and operations.
Input
$ARGUMENTS = the user's message for this workflow. If none was provided, set $ARGUMENTS to empty and let the skill handle it.
Follow .github/sddp/workflows/deployment-operations/WORKFLOW.md.
When the shared workflow asks the user to choose or answer:
- Ask the user explicitly in chat and wait for the reply before continuing.
- Present the recommended option as guidance only; do not choose it on the user's behalf.
- Allow free-form answers anywhere the shared workflow allows them.
- Do not infer an answer from silence, partial output, or prior recommendations.
No ad hoc browsing. Only when the workflow says Delegate: Technical Researcher, read .github/agents/_technical-researcher.md and do only that delegated step.
Report progress at major milestones with completed and remaining work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 25 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 49828e0e59b2
sddp-devops is a skill published in the GitHub repository attilaszasz/sdd-pilot (95 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 270 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
universal-live-check
Universal live-check framework for coding agents. Executes incremental, deterministic validation across all software domains (CLI, backend, frontend, mobile, embedded, libs). Change-type-aware (feat, fix, hotfix, refactor, migrate, docs). Triggers whenever an agent needs to validate code quality, run linting, perform…
code-review-hardening
Use this skill for rigorous, structured code review with a self-repair loop. Applies change-type-aware strategies (feat, fix, hotfix, refactor, migrate, docs). Findings are severity-classified, then auto-fixed where possible. Triggers on PR reviews, code review requests, or when reviewing any change set.
contextual-stewardship
Use this skill when the user makes a technical decision, establishes a new pattern, defines business rules, or explicitly asks to remember or save a guideline. Also use this skill when you are about to implement a feature, write code, plan an architecture, or make a technical decision - you MUST retrieve contextual…
project-guidelines-writer
Use this skill when the user wants repository guidance documents generated or refreshed, including AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLEGUIDE.md, TESTING.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and SECURITY.md. It analyzes the repository, generates all six guideline files by default, prefers managed-section updates for existing files, and…
quality-grading
Use this skill to grade code, specifications, or design documents across four quality dimensions using a 1-5 scoring scale. In grade-and-fix mode, the skill auto-improves artifacts scoring below 5 without prompting. Invoke when you want consistent quality assessment on design, implementation, or specification with…
spec-driven-task-decomposer
Use this skill when approved requirements and design need to be decomposed into tasks.md for Phase 3 of a Spec-Driven change. It creates atomic, traceable implementation and testing tasks, validates the plan, and should not be used to design architecture or write implementation code.