Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beita6969/ScienceClaw --skill asreview-screeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/asreview-screening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/asreview-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/asreview-screening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/asreview-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/asreview-screening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
asreview-screening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ASReview Screening
Use active learning to prioritize and screen papers for systematic reviews, reducing manual workload by up to 95%. ASReview uses machine learning to learn from your screening decisions and prioritize the most likely relevant papers.
When to Use
- "I have 500 papers to screen for my systematic review"
- "Help me prioritize papers for inclusion"
- "Set up active learning screening for my review"
- "How many papers do I need to screen manually?"
When NOT to Use
- Searching for papers (use literature-search)
- Performing meta-analysis (use meta-analysis)
- Writing the review (use systematic-review + paper-writing)
- Small sets (< 50 papers) — manual screening is faster
Setup
Install ASReview
pip install asreview asreview-insights asreview-datatools
Prepare Input Data
ASReview accepts RIS, CSV, TSV, or Excel files with at minimum:
title: Paper titleabstract: Paper abstract
Optional but recommended:
doi,authors,year,keywords,label(if some are pre-labeled)
Export from Search Results
# Convert Semantic Scholar / OpenAlex results to ASReview format
import csv
def export_for_asreview(papers: list[dict], output_path: str):
"""Export papers to CSV for ASReview."""
with open(output_path, 'w', newline='', encoding='utf-8') as f:
writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames=[
'title', 'abstract', 'authors', 'year', 'doi', 'keywords'
])
writer.writeheader()
for p in papers:
writer.writerow({
'title': p.get('title', ''),
'abstract': p.get('abstract', ''),
'authors': '; '.join(a.get('name', '') for a in p.get('authors', [])),
'year': p.get('year', ''),
'doi': p.get('externalIds', {}).get('DOI', ''),
'keywords': '; '.join(p.get('fieldsOfStudy', []))
})
print(f"Exported {len(papers)} papers to {output_path}")
Screening Workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 211 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 450288d22c27
asreview-screening is a skill published in the GitHub repository beita6969/ScienceClaw (898 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…
scanpy
Standard single-cell RNA-seq analysis pipeline. Use for QC, normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA/UMAP/t-SNE), clustering, differential expression, and visualization. Best for exploratory scRNA-seq analysis with established workflows. For deep learning models use scvi-tools; for data format questions use…
structure-prediction
Protein structure prediction from sequence. ESMFold-based, single GPU, no MSA needed. Predicts 3D structures with pLDDT confidence scores for drug discovery targets.
biomcp
Search and retrieve biomedical data - genes, variants, clinical trials, diagnostic tests, articles, drugs, diseases, pathways, proteins, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and phenotype-disease matching. Use for gene function, variant pathogenicity, trials, diagnostics, drug safety, pathway context, disease workups…
biomcp-research
Do biomedical literature and variant research with the BioMCP CLI, and file what you learn about the tool itself as issues in the biomcp repo.
biological-expert
Expert-level biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, and computational biology. Use when the user mentions biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, or genomics, or when the task involves Molecular Biology, Genomics & Bioinformatics, Systems Biology, or Data Analysis.