Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beita6969/ScienceClaw --skill meta-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02328 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01164 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00466 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
meta-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Meta-Analysis
Quantitative synthesis of results from multiple studies. Calculates pooled effect sizes, assesses heterogeneity, detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots.
When to Use
- "Combine these study results into a meta-analysis"
- "Calculate the pooled odds ratio from these trials"
- "Create a forest plot of these effect sizes"
- "Test for publication bias with a funnel plot"
- "What's the heterogeneity (I²) across these studies?"
- "Run a random-effects meta-analysis"
When NOT to Use
- Designing a systematic review protocol (use systematic-review)
- Searching for studies (use literature-search)
- Single-study statistical analysis (use statsmodels-stats)
- Narrative literature review (use paper-writing)
Effect Size Types
| Outcome Type | Effect Size | Formula | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous | SMD (Cohen's d / Hedges' g) | $(M_1 - M_2) / S_p$ | Comparing means across studies with different scales |
| Continuous | Mean Difference (MD) | $M_1 - M_2$ | Same outcome measure across all studies |
| Binary | Odds Ratio (OR) | $(a \times d) / (b \times c)$ | Case-control studies, binary outcomes |
| Binary | Risk Ratio (RR) | $(a/(a+b)) / (c/(c+d))$ | Cohort studies, clinical trials |
| Binary | Risk Difference (RD) | $R_1 - R_2$ | Absolute risk reduction |
| Time-to-event | Hazard Ratio (HR) | From Cox model | Survival analysis |
| Correlation | Fisher's z | $0.5 \ln((1+r)/(1-r))$ | Correlation studies |
Core Analysis with Python
Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
def meta_analysis_random_effects(effects, variances, study_names=None):
"""
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.
Args:
effects: array of effect sizes (log-OR, SMD, etc.)
variances: array of within-study variances
study_names: optional list of study labels
Returns:
dict with pooled estimate, CI, heterogeneity stats
"""
effects = np.array(effects, dtype=float)
variances = np.array(variances, dtype=float)
k = len(effects)
# Fixed-effect weights
w_fe = 1.0 / variances
pooled_fe = np.sum(w_fe * effects) / np.sum(w_fe)
# Cochran's Q
Q = np.sum(w_fe * (effects - pooled_fe) ** 2)
df = k - 1
p_heterogeneity = 1 - stats.chi2.cdf(Q, df)
# tau-squared (DerSimonian-Laird)
C = np.sum(w_fe) - np.sum(w_fe ** 2) / np.sum(w_fe)
tau2 = max(0, (Q - df) / C)
# I-squared
I2 = max(0, (Q - df) / Q * 100) if Q > 0 else 0
# Random-effects weights
w_re = 1.0 / (variances + tau2)
pooled_re = np.sum(w_re * effects) / np.sum(w_re)
se_pooled = np.sqrt(1.0 / np.sum(w_re))
ci_lower = pooled_re - 1.96 * se_pooled
ci_upper = pooled_re + 1.96 * se_pooled
z = pooled_re / se_pooled
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
return {
'pooled_effect': pooled_re,
'se': se_pooled,
'ci_lower': ci_lower,
'ci_upper': ci_upper,
'z': z,
'p_value': p_value,
'tau2': tau2,
'I2': I2,
'Q': Q,
'Q_df': df,
'Q_p': p_heterogeneity,
'k': k,
'model': 'DerSimonian-Laird random-effects'
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 247 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 8c843032112f
meta-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository beita6969/ScienceClaw (898 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,328 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…
scanpy
Standard single-cell RNA-seq analysis pipeline. Use for QC, normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA/UMAP/t-SNE), clustering, differential expression, and visualization. Best for exploratory scRNA-seq analysis with established workflows. For deep learning models use scvi-tools; for data format questions use…
structure-prediction
Protein structure prediction from sequence. ESMFold-based, single GPU, no MSA needed. Predicts 3D structures with pLDDT confidence scores for drug discovery targets.
biomcp
Search and retrieve biomedical data - genes, variants, clinical trials, diagnostic tests, articles, drugs, diseases, pathways, proteins, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and phenotype-disease matching. Use for gene function, variant pathogenicity, trials, diagnostics, drug safety, pathway context, disease workups…
biomcp-research
Do biomedical literature and variant research with the BioMCP CLI, and file what you learn about the tool itself as issues in the biomcp repo.
biological-expert
Expert-level biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, and computational biology. Use when the user mentions biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, or genomics, or when the task involves Molecular Biology, Genomics & Bioinformatics, Systems Biology, or Data Analysis.