ScienceClaw is an agent system for scientific work that completes tasks as typed, executable workflows and turns replay-verified improvements into reusable skills and operators. It is intended for AI-assisted research across natural and social science disciplines. The catalogue entries are its skills and instruction for use with the system.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beita6969/ScienceClaw --skill meta-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/meta-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02328 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00931 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00466 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
meta-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Meta-Analysis
Quantitative synthesis of results from multiple studies. Calculates pooled effect sizes, assesses heterogeneity, detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots.
When to Use
- "Combine these study results into a meta-analysis"
- "Calculate the pooled odds ratio from these trials"
- "Create a forest plot of these effect sizes"
- "Test for publication bias with a funnel plot"
- "What's the heterogeneity (I²) across these studies?"
- "Run a random-effects meta-analysis"
When NOT to Use
- Designing a systematic review protocol (use systematic-review)
- Searching for studies (use literature-search)
- Single-study statistical analysis (use statsmodels-stats)
- Narrative literature review (use paper-writing)
Effect Size Types
| Outcome Type | Effect Size | Formula | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous | SMD (Cohen's d / Hedges' g) | $(M_1 - M_2) / S_p$ | Comparing means across studies with different scales |
| Continuous | Mean Difference (MD) | $M_1 - M_2$ | Same outcome measure across all studies |
| Binary | Odds Ratio (OR) | $(a \times d) / (b \times c)$ | Case-control studies, binary outcomes |
| Binary | Risk Ratio (RR) | $(a/(a+b)) / (c/(c+d))$ | Cohort studies, clinical trials |
| Binary | Risk Difference (RD) | $R_1 - R_2$ | Absolute risk reduction |
| Time-to-event | Hazard Ratio (HR) | From Cox model | Survival analysis |
| Correlation | Fisher's z | $0.5 \ln((1+r)/(1-r))$ | Correlation studies |
Core Analysis with Python
Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
def meta_analysis_random_effects(effects, variances, study_names=None):
"""
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.
Args:
effects: array of effect sizes (log-OR, SMD, etc.)
variances: array of within-study variances
study_names: optional list of study labels
Returns:
dict with pooled estimate, CI, heterogeneity stats
"""
effects = np.array(effects, dtype=float)
variances = np.array(variances, dtype=float)
k = len(effects)
# Fixed-effect weights
w_fe = 1.0 / variances
pooled_fe = np.sum(w_fe * effects) / np.sum(w_fe)
# Cochran's Q
Q = np.sum(w_fe * (effects - pooled_fe) ** 2)
df = k - 1
p_heterogeneity = 1 - stats.chi2.cdf(Q, df)
# tau-squared (DerSimonian-Laird)
C = np.sum(w_fe) - np.sum(w_fe ** 2) / np.sum(w_fe)
tau2 = max(0, (Q - df) / C)
# I-squared
I2 = max(0, (Q - df) / Q * 100) if Q > 0 else 0
# Random-effects weights
w_re = 1.0 / (variances + tau2)
pooled_re = np.sum(w_re * effects) / np.sum(w_re)
se_pooled = np.sqrt(1.0 / np.sum(w_re))
ci_lower = pooled_re - 1.96 * se_pooled
ci_upper = pooled_re + 1.96 * se_pooled
z = pooled_re / se_pooled
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
return {
'pooled_effect': pooled_re,
'se': se_pooled,
'ci_lower': ci_lower,
'ci_upper': ci_upper,
'z': z,
'p_value': p_value,
'tau2': tau2,
'I2': I2,
'Q': Q,
'Q_df': df,
'Q_p': p_heterogeneity,
'k': k,
'model': 'DerSimonian-Laird random-effects'
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 8c843032112f
meta-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository beita6969/ScienceClaw (1,019 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,328 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…
scanpy
Standard single-cell RNA-seq analysis pipeline. Use for QC, normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA/UMAP/t-SNE), clustering, differential expression, and visualization. Best for exploratory scRNA-seq analysis with established workflows. For deep learning models use scvi-tools; for data format questions use…
structure-prediction
Protein structure prediction from sequence. ESMFold-based, single GPU, no MSA needed. Predicts 3D structures with pLDDT confidence scores for drug discovery targets.
biomcp
Search and retrieve biomedical data - genes, variants, clinical trials, diagnostic tests, articles, drugs, diseases, pathways, proteins, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and phenotype-disease matching. Use for gene function, variant pathogenicity, trials, diagnostics, drug safety, pathway context, disease workups…
biomcp-research
Do biomedical literature and variant research with the BioMCP CLI, and file what you learn about the tool itself as issues in the biomcp repo.
biological-expert
Expert-level biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, and computational biology. Use when the user mentions biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, or genomics, or when the task involves Molecular Biology, Genomics & Bioinformatics, Systems Biology, or Data Analysis.