Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beita6969/ScienceClaw --skill parameter-optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/parameter-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/parameter-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/parameter-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/parameter-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/parameter-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
parameter-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Parameter Optimization
Goal
Provide a workflow to design experiments, rank parameter influence, and select optimization strategies for materials simulation calibration.
Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
Inputs to Gather
Before running any scripts, collect from the user:
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Parameter bounds | Min/max for each parameter with units | kappa: [0.1, 10.0] W/mK |
| Evaluation budget | Max number of simulations allowed | 50 runs |
| Noise level | Stochasticity of simulation outputs | low, medium, high |
| Constraints | Feasibility rules or forbidden regions | kappa + mobility < 5 |
Decision Guidance
Choosing a DOE Method
Is dimension <= 3 AND full coverage needed?
├── YES → Use factorial
└── NO → Is sensitivity analysis the goal?
├── YES → Use quasi-random (preferred; "sobol" is accepted but deprecated)
└── NO → Use lhs (Latin Hypercube)
| Method | Best For | Avoid When |
|---|---|---|
lhs |
General exploration, moderate dimensions (3-20) | Need exact grid coverage |
sobol |
Sensitivity analysis, uniform coverage | Very high dimensions (>20) |
factorial |
Low dimension (<4), need all corners | High dimension (exponential growth) |
Choosing an Optimizer
Is dimension <= 5 AND budget <= 100?
├── YES → Bayesian Optimization
└── NO → Is dimension <= 20?
├── YES → CMA-ES
└── NO → Random Search with screening
| Noise Level | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Low | Gradient-based if derivatives available, else Bayesian Optimization |
| Medium | Bayesian Optimization with noise model |
| High | Evolutionary algorithms or robust Bayesian Optimization |
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Output Fields |
|---|---|
scripts/doe_generator.py |
samples, method, coverage |
scripts/optimizer_selector.py |
recommended, expected_evals, notes |
scripts/sensitivity_summary.py |
ranking, notes |
scripts/surrogate_builder.py |
model_type, metrics, notes |
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/doe_methods.md 4.3 KB
- references/optimizer_selection.md 5.4 KB
- references/sensitivity_guidelines.md 4.6 KB
- references/surrogate_guidelines.md 5.3 KB
- scripts/doe_generator.py 4.1 KB runs code
- scripts/optimizer_selector.py 2.4 KB runs code
- scripts/sensitivity_summary.py 2.1 KB runs code
- scripts/surrogate_builder.py 2.1 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 142 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A f96b990a0d61
parameter-optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository beita6969/ScienceClaw (898 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,294 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…
scanpy
Standard single-cell RNA-seq analysis pipeline. Use for QC, normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA/UMAP/t-SNE), clustering, differential expression, and visualization. Best for exploratory scRNA-seq analysis with established workflows. For deep learning models use scvi-tools; for data format questions use…
structure-prediction
Protein structure prediction from sequence. ESMFold-based, single GPU, no MSA needed. Predicts 3D structures with pLDDT confidence scores for drug discovery targets.
biomcp
Search and retrieve biomedical data - genes, variants, clinical trials, diagnostic tests, articles, drugs, diseases, pathways, proteins, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and phenotype-disease matching. Use for gene function, variant pathogenicity, trials, diagnostics, drug safety, pathway context, disease workups…
biomcp-research
Do biomedical literature and variant research with the BioMCP CLI, and file what you learn about the tool itself as issues in the biomcp repo.
biological-expert
Expert-level biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, and computational biology. Use when the user mentions biology, biotechnology, genetics, bioinformatics, or genomics, or when the task involves Molecular Biology, Genomics & Bioinformatics, Systems Biology, or Data Analysis.