conditioning

conditioning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from benchflow-ai/skillsbench. It costs 52 tokens per session (1,218 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A preprocessing workflow for gravitational-wave detector readings before analysis. It removes unwanted low-frequency noise, adjusts the sampling rate, removes edge artifacts, and estimates the noise spectrum.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare PyCBC time-series data for matched filtering and other gravitational-wave analyses.
Why use it?
Raw detector data contains noise and processing artifacts that can interfere with signal searches.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to prepare PyCBC time-series data for matched filtering and other gravitational-wave analyses.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning
About the project

SkillsBench is a benchmark for measuring how effectively AI agents use modular skills—folders containing instructions, scripts, and resources—to complete specialized tasks. It helps researchers and developers evaluate both skill quality and agent behavior, including tasks that require combining multiple skills. The catalogue’s skills and instructions are evaluated as part of this workflow.

benchflow-ai/skillsbench · 1,764 stars · on GitHub · skillsbench.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill conditioning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benchflow-ai/skillsbench

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for conditioning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for conditioning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/conditioning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,218 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.01218
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00609
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00244
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00122

Measured 8d ago against content hash bf7580c93e48, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

conditioning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

tasks/gravitational-wave-detection/environment/skills/conditioning/SKILL.md · 140 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Gravitational Wave Data Conditioning

Data conditioning is essential before matched filtering. Raw gravitational wave detector data contains low-frequency noise, instrumental artifacts, and needs proper sampling rates for computational efficiency.

Overview

The conditioning pipeline typically involves:

  1. High-pass filtering (remove low-frequency noise below ~15 Hz)
  2. Resampling (downsample to appropriate sampling rate)
  3. Crop filter wraparound (remove edge artifacts from filtering)
  4. PSD estimation (calculate power spectral density for matched filtering)

High-Pass Filtering

Remove low-frequency noise and instrumental artifacts:

from pycbc.filter import highpass

# High-pass filter at 15 Hz (typical for LIGO/Virgo data)
strain_filtered = highpass(strain, 15.0)

# Common cutoff frequencies:
# 15 Hz: Standard for ground-based detectors
# 20 Hz: Higher cutoff, more aggressive noise removal
# 10 Hz: Lower cutoff, preserves more low-frequency content

Why 15 Hz? Ground-based detectors like LIGO/Virgo have significant low-frequency noise. High-pass filtering removes this noise while preserving the gravitational wave signal (typically >20 Hz for binary mergers).

Resampling

Downsample the data to reduce computational cost:

from pycbc.filter import resample_to_delta_t

# Resample to 2048 Hz (common for matched filtering)
delta_t = 1.0 / 2048
strain_resampled = resample_to_delta_t(strain_filtered, delta_t)

# Or to 4096 Hz for higher resolution
delta_t = 1.0 / 4096
strain_resampled = resample_to_delta_t(strain_filtered, delta_t)

# Common sampling rates:
# 2048 Hz: Standard, computationally efficient
# 4096 Hz: Higher resolution, better for high-mass systems

Note: Resampling should happen AFTER high-pass filtering to avoid aliasing. The Nyquist frequency (half the sampling rate) must be above the signal frequency of interest.

Crop Filter Wraparound

Remove edge artifacts introduced by filtering:

# Crop 2 seconds from both ends to remove filter wraparound
conditioned = strain_resampled.crop(2, 2)

# The crop() method removes time from start and end:
# crop(start_seconds, end_seconds)
# Common values: 2-4 seconds on each end

# Verify the duration
print(f"Original duration: {strain_resampled.duration} s")
print(f"Cropped duration: {conditioned.duration} s")

Read the full file on GitHub · 140 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 140 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A bf7580c93e48

Subscribe to this mod's changes

conditioning is a skill published in the GitHub repository benchflow-ai/skillsbench (1,764 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,218 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.