SkillsBench is a benchmark for measuring how effectively AI agents use modular skills—folders containing instructions, scripts, and resources—to complete specialized tasks. It helps researchers and developers evaluate both skill quality and agent behavior, including tasks that require combining multiple skills. The catalogue’s skills and instructions are evaluated as part of this workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add benchflow-ai/skillsbench --skill mip-solver-and-solution-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benchflow-ai/skillsbenchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/mip-solver-and-solution-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/mip-solver-and-solution-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/mip-solver-and-solution-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/mip-solver-and-solution-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benchflow-ai/skillsbench/mip-solver-and-solution-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 274 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02224 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00445 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
mip-solver-and-solution-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 286 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MIP Solver and Solution Audit
Core principle
A valid optimization submission has one final solution, one set of recomputed metrics, and one truthful solver report. The solver objective, written output, metrics file, and explanation must all refer to the same final solution.
Feasible does not mean optimal. A time-limited MIP solve may return a useful incumbent without proving optimality. Report that distinction clearly.
Solver discovery
For Python optimization tasks, test installed solver packages before concluding that no solver is available. Prefer a callable installed solver over writing a model for an unavailable package or falling back to a heuristic-only method.
PySCIPOpt is a good first check for binary and mixed-integer models:
try:
from pyscipopt import Model, quicksum
SCIP_AVAILABLE = True
except Exception as exc:
SCIP_AVAILABLE = False
SCIP_IMPORT_ERROR = exc
If PySCIPOpt imports successfully, use it unless the task or environment clearly provides a better solver. Do not skip it because other packages or command-line binaries are unavailable.
If the task requires an integer program or optimization solver, do not submit a pure greedy search, local search, swap heuristic, or advisory script as the main method unless the task explicitly allows that substitution.
Minimal PySCIPOpt pattern
from pyscipopt import Model, quicksum
model = Model("mip_model")
model.setParam("limits/time", 600.0)
# create binary/integer variables
# add hard constraints
# build named objective components
model.setObjective(objective_expr, "minimize")
model.optimize()
status = str(model.getStatus()).lower()
if model.getNSols() == 0:
raise RuntimeError(f"No feasible solution found; solver status={status}")
sol = model.getBestSol()
incumbent_objective = float(model.getObjVal())
try:
best_bound = float(model.getDualbound())
except Exception:
best_bound = None
try:
mip_gap = float(model.getGap())
except Exception:
mip_gap = None
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 286 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 34ab1c8cd80a
mip-solver-and-solution-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository benchflow-ai/skillsbench (1,757 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,224 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
run-aeon-benchmark
Use when asked to run, benchmark, evaluate, or score an LLM with AEON Bench. You run the AEON Bench Pod on the user's machine, point it at a model, run the benchmark, and submit the signed result to the public leaderboard at aeon-bench.com. All work happens on the pod. The mothership only shows the board and accepts…
plate-tectonics-geospatial
Analyze plate tectonics data using GeoPandas, identify points within plates, and calculate distances to boundaries.
data-matching
Matching observation data to simulation output with exact datetime and depth binning.
model-calibration
Calculating RMSE metrics and parameter calibration for lake model validation.
dbscan-custom-metric
Run DBSCAN clustering with a custom distance metric using sklearn, including how to define weighted Euclidean metrics and extract cluster centroids.
greedy-bipartite-matching
Implement greedy bipartite matching for pairing cluster centroids with expert annotations.