Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to berntpopp/genefoundry-router. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/main/.claude/skills/auth-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/berntpopp/genefoundry-routerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/auth-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/auth-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/auth-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/auth-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/berntpopp/genefoundry-router/auth-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
auth-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Auth Change
Follow AGENTS.md first. Auth is the router's trust boundary; ground in docs/SECURITY-ASSESSMENT-2026-06-29.md and the MCP authorization spec.
Workflow
- Work in
auth.py(verifiers/modes),config.py(GF_AUTH_MODE,GF_ALLOW_INSECURE, JWT/OAuth settings), andcli.py(bind guard) as applicable. Modes:none(dev / loopback),jwt,oauth. - Never forward the caller's token to backends — the enforcement is
make_proxy_client()incomposition.py(forward_incoming_headers=False); keeptests/unit/test_no_token_passthrough.pygreen. - Keep the secure-by-default guard:
is_insecure_public_bind(incli.py) refusesGF_AUTH_MODE=noneon a non-loopback bind unlessGF_ALLOW_INSECURE=true. - Audience binding (RFC 8707):
resource_base_url= the audience (…/mcp), not the rootbase_url; tolerate a duplicated/mcpin the resource (some clients append it). Serve RFC 9728 Protected Resource Metadata +WWW-Authenticate. - For the OAuth proxy, keep a durable client store and skip redundant consent for an already-approved client.
- Add / adjust unit tests; run
make ci-local.
Common mistakes
- Setting
resource_base_urlto the rootbase_url(breaks RFC 8707 audience validation). - Relying on the framework default for header forwarding (it forwards the caller token).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 23 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A c86560c38c77
auth-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository berntpopp/genefoundry-router (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adaptyv
How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for…
benchling-integration
Benchling Python SDK and REST API integration for registry entities, inventory, ELN entries, workflows, Benchling Apps, and Data Warehouse queries. Use when automating lab data with benchling-sdk or the v2 API.
implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting
Implement API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and adaptive rate limiting algorithms to prevent DDoS, brute force, and credential stuffing attacks.
implementing-api-gateway-security-controls
Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point…
implementing-api-schema-validation-security
Implement API schema validation using OpenAPI specifications and JSON Schema to enforce input/output contracts and prevent injection, data exposure, and mass assignment attacks.
securing-api-gateway-with-aws-waf
Securing API Gateway endpoints with AWS WAF by configuring managed rule groups for OWASP Top 10 protection, creating custom rate limiting rules, implementing bot control, setting up IP reputation filtering, and monitoring WAF metrics for security effectiveness.