BloomDesktop: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/improve-test-automation-coverage/SKILL.md

improve-test-automation-coverage is a skill for Claude Code from BloomBooks/BloomDesktop. It costs 78 tokens per session (191 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command entry point for automating a specified number of test cases whose automation status is marked Planned in Notion, a workspace and database tool. Each test is handled in its own isolated worktree, a separate working copy of the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to increase automated test coverage by claiming planned Notion cases and implementing them independently.
Why use it?
It turns a backlog of planned tests into separate automation jobs and keeps their code changes isolated from one another.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

This is BloomBooks/BloomDesktop's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on BloomDesktop itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything BloomDesktop configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to BloomBooks/BloomDesktop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BloomBooks/BloomDesktop/master/.claude/skills/improve-test-automation-coverage/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BloomBooks/BloomDesktop

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for improve-test-automation-coverage

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for improve-test-automation-coverage

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bloombooks/bloomdesktop/improve-test-automation-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 78 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 191 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Agent Snooping · line 10
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00078 $0.00191
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00096
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00038
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00019

Measured 4d ago against content hash 88c83bcd7e0d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

improve-test-automation-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/improve-test-automation-coverage/SKILL.md · 12 lines

What it actually says

This is the slash-command entry point only. The procedure, the helper scripts, and the worker brief live in .github/skills/improve-test-automation-coverage/. Open .github/skills/improve-test-automation-coverage/SKILL.md and follow it exactly, with the argument as N.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 12 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 88c83bcd7e0d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

improve-test-automation-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository BloomBooks/BloomDesktop (44 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

scaffold-dotnet-test-project

MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero"…

dotnet/skills · 139 tokens

cy-execute-task

Implement and verify an existing CompozyOS spec task, then update its tracking. Excludes review remediation.

compozy/compozy · 27 tokens

team-qa

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.

Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · 73 tokens

gh-issue

Size-audit, write, and split BanyanDB issues that somebody else or an automated TDD workflow can implement. Use whenever the user asks to file or revise an issue, decide whether an issue is too large, make an issue TDD-ready, turn a design into tickets, or split an umbrella into executable leaves. Do not draft or file…

apache/skywalking-banyandb · 91 tokens

implement-feature

Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, evidence, and PR-ready output.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 23 tokens

conductor-implement

Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.

rmyndharis/antigravity-skills · 17 tokens