Awesome Journal Skills is a collection of agent skill packs tailored to hundreds of academic journals across fields including economics, social science, medicine, science, and engineering. Researchers use the packs for tasks such as choosing topics, designing empirical strategies, preparing tables and figures, submitting papers, and responding to reviewers. The catalogue entries are the project's journal-specific skills and related plugins.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejpol-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/aejpol-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/aejpol-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/aejpol-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/aejpol-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/aejpol-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01594 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00797 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
aejpol-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AEJ: Policy Workflow Router (aejpol-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which aejpol- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy (AEJ: Policy) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal for the economic analysis OF policy. AEJ: Policy rewards a paper built around a clear policy question whose answer carries a welfare, cost-benefit, or distributional implication, identified credibly (quasi-experimental / RCT / applied theory) and reproducible to AEA standards. The policy question and its counterfactual are the through-line of every skill below.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Policy. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Policy and not a sibling: review is single-blind through the AEA submission system (the manuscript carries the title/byline/affiliations); JEL codes are required; the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor run a pre-publication reproducibility check on a deposit in the AEA Data and Code Repository (openICPSR); the bar is broad policy interest + credible causal evidence + a welfare/cost-benefit reading, not a field-public-finance bar (J. Public Economics) or an identification-for-its-own-sake bar (AEJ: Applied). Re-verify volatile specifics (submission fee, editors) on the official AEA pages — official AEA pages checked 2026-06-20.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between identification, the policy framing, exhibits, and the response letter
- An AEJ: Policy decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| No sharp policy question, or fit vs. JPubE / AEJ:Applied / AER unclear | aejpol-topic-selection |
| Contribution vs. the policy-evaluation literature is fuzzy or undersold | aejpol-literature-positioning |
| Causal design (DID / IV / RDD / RCT) for the policy's effect is shaky | aejpol-identification |
| Need a model/welfare framework to read estimates as a policy effect | aejpol-theory-model |
| Estimate stability, sensitivity, and threats need stress-testing | aejpol-robustness |
| Exhibits are dense; significance asterisks still present | aejpol-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the policy takeaway; abstract/intro do not land | aejpol-writing-style |
| Data/code deposit, README, AEA Data Editor prep, restricted-data path | aejpol-replication-package |
| Want to anticipate the referees' objections before submitting | aejpol-referee-strategy |
| Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight | aejpol-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | aejpol-rebuttal |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 04b0d25b2320
aejpol-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills (1,142 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,594 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other skills, from other repositories
alterlab-qiime2-amplicon
Runs 16S/ITS amplicon (microbiome) analysis with the QIIME 2 amplicon distribution (2026.1; renamed to "qiime2" in 2026.4) in the correct order: manifest import, cutadapt trim-paired primer removal BEFORE dada2 denoise-paired (trunc-len chosen from the demux quality .qzv), feature-classifier classify-sklearn against a…
alterlab-pyhealth
Develops, tests, and deploys clinical machine learning models with the PyHealth healthcare AI toolkit. Use when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC), physiological signals (EEG, ECG), healthcare…
alterlab-phylogenetics
Build phylogenetic trees end-to-end from raw sequences — MAFFT multiple sequence alignment, optional TrimAl trimming, IQ-TREE 2 maximum-likelihood inference with model selection and bootstraps, FastTree for large datasets, then visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. Use when reconstructing trees from sequences (FASTA) for…
alterlab-pydicom
Reads, writes, and manipulates DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) medical imaging files with the pydicom Python library. Use when reading/writing/modifying DICOM data, extracting pixel data from CT, MRI, X-ray, or ultrasound images, anonymizing DICOM files, working with DICOM metadata and tags…
alterlab-eda
Exploratory data analysis (EDA) on a scientific data file — auto-detects the format, runs structure/quality/statistics checks, and writes a markdown EDA report with downstream recommendations. Use when asked to "explore", "analyze", "summarize", "profile", or "QC" a data file, or to understand its…
alterlab-shap
Model interpretability and explainability with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) — feature importance and plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap). Use when explaining ML model predictions, computing feature importance, debugging models, analyzing bias or fairness, comparing models, or implementing…