Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/csmar432/finai-researchnpx agentmods add skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-checkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-submit-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.02290 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01145 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00458 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
fin-submit-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
fin-submit-check
根据目标期刊要求,对论文进行投稿前全面检查,涵盖格式、引用、图表、数据可用性等所有投稿必需项。
触发条件
- 关键词:
投稿前检查submit check格式检查合规检查投稿检查论文检查 - Skill语法:
Skill: fin-submit-check - 前置条件: 已有完整的论文草稿 (
.tex文件)
十大检查类别
1. 匿名性检查 (双盲审稿)
检查项:
□ 作者姓名未出现在正文、致谢、基金声明中
□ 无"感谢XX老师的指导"类致谢
□ 基金编号是否匿名化处理
□ 运行 latexmk 或 pdflatex 后检查 .log 中是否有 "[author name] removed"
检查命令:
grep -i "author" paper.tex
grep -i "感谢" paper.tex
grep "removed" paper.log || echo "No author info found"
2. 格式检查
检查项:
□ 字数/页数在限制内
□ 行距正确 (单倍/双倍)
□ 页边距符合要求
□ 字体要求满足 (如 JF 要求 Times New Roman 12pt)
□ 标题格式正确
□ 脚注格式正确
针对 JF/JFE:
- 主文本不超过 50 页 (含参考文献)
- 12pt Times New Roman
- 双倍行距
- 2.54cm 页边距
3. 图表分辨率检查
from PIL import Image
from pathlib import Path
def check_figure_resolution(figures_dir: str, min_dpi: int = 300) -> list:
"""检查所有图表分辨率"""
issues = []
for f in Path(figures_dir).glob("*.png"):
img = Image.open(f)
dpi = img.info.get("dpi", (72, 72))
if min(dpi) < min_dpi:
issues.append(f"LOW DPI: {f} = {dpi}")
print(f"{f.name}: {dpi[0]:.0f} x {dpi[1]:.0f} DPI")
return issues
# 执行
issues = check_figure_resolution("figures/", min_dpi=300)
检查项:
□ 所有图表 >= 300 DPI
□ 图表有清晰标题
□ 图表在正文中被引用
□ 图表编号连续
□ EPS/PDF 格式用于矢量图
□ PNG/JPEG 用于位图
4. 引用完整性检查
检查项:
□ 无 [?], [citation needed] 等占位符
□ 所有参考文献 .bib 条目都在正文中被引用
□ 所有引用的文献都在 .bib 中
□ DOI 链接有效
□ 无重复引用
检查命令:
grep -c "\[?\]" paper.tex # 应为 0
grep -c "\\cite{" paper.tex
5. 参考文献格式检查
检查项:
□ JF/JFE 格式: Author (Year). Title. Journal Volume: Pages.
□ 经济研究/金融研究: GB/T 7714-2015
□ 作者姓名格式一致
□ 期刊名称缩写正确
□ 年份准确
验证命令:
python scripts/journal_template.py --validate-refs --journal JF
常见格式错误:
❌ Author, A. B. (Year). Title. Journal. -> 缺少卷期页
❌ Author, A. (ed.). Title. -> 作者格式不一致
6. 公式编号检查
检查项:
□ 所有公式都有编号
□ 编号连续无跳跃
□ 交叉引用有效 (\eqref{eq:xxx})
□ 重要公式有名称标注
检查命令:
grep "\\label{" paper.tex | grep -v "fig:" | grep -v "tab:" | wc -l
grep -E "\\ref\{eq:" paper.tex | sort -u
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 326 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A d5a6f2e0dd7c
fin-submit-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository csmar432/finai-research (100 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,290 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
econometrics-phd-level
A guide to econometrics, the use of statistics to study relationships in data, based on a 12-part Korean lecture series. It routes questions to explanations of topics such as regression, panel data, instrumental variables, and causal comparisons.
r-econometrics
Generates rigorous, modern, reproducible R code for causal inference and panel econometrics with fixest, heterogeneity-robust DiD estimators (Callaway-Sant'Anna, Sun-Abraham, BJS, de Chaisemartin-D'Haultfoeuille), weak-IV-robust inference, optimal-bandwidth RDD via rdrobust, and wild cluster bootstrap. Use when the…
audit-reproducibility
Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.
review-paper
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via…
grant-proposal
Scaffold a research grant proposal (NSF, NIH, ERC, or foundation) by composing existing primitives — pulls identification strategy from an /interview-me spec, delegates the data-management plan to /data-management-plan and the facilities statement to /capture-environment, and emits a funder-requirements checklist. Use…
preregister
Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when…