claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflownpx agentmods add skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/review-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Agent Snooping · line 350 Skill reads from agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). These directories may contain API keys, personal settings, and other credentials that the skill has no legitimate need to access.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that access agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). If configuration values are needed, pass them explicitly as parameters or environment variabl
- medium Agent Snooping · line 478 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 479 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 480 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 480 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 481 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.06571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.03285 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00657 |
Grade A, and why
review-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 483 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Manuscript Review
Produce a thorough, constructive review of an academic manuscript — the kind of report a top-journal referee would write.
Which review skill do I want?
/review-paper(this skill) — single comprehensive report, optional--adversarialcritic-fixer loop, or--peer <journal>simulated peer-review pipeline. Best for most drafts./seven-pass-review— seven independent lenses in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations) then synthesized. Heavier (7× token cost). Best for submission-ready drafts or R&R stage where you need maximum coverage./respond-to-referees— if you already have referee comments and need a response document, not another review./slide-excellence— for lecture slides, not papers.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to a paper (.tex, .pdf, or .qmd), or a filename in master_supporting_docs/. Optional flags:
--adversarial— critic-fixer loop (max 5 rounds).--peer <JOURNAL>— simulated peer review pipeline calibrated to<JOURNAL>(see.claude/references/journal-profiles.mdfor available short names).--r2/--r3— R&R continuation mode (requires--peer). Reloads prior round, classifies concerns Resolved / Partial / Not addressed.--stress— hostile-editor stress test (requires--peer). Forces SKEPTIC dispositions, doubles critical peeves.--variance(followed by integer N, default 3) — reviewer-disposition variance mode (requires--peer). Runs N referees with independently sampled dispositions from the 6-way taxonomy. Editor aggregates into a decision distribution, not a point estimate. Mutually exclusive with--stressand--r2/--r3.--no-novelty-check— skip editor's WebSearch novelty probe (default is ON).--no-cross-artifact— skip auto-invocation of/review-r+/audit-reproducibilityon referenced scripts.
Already received referee comments? Use
/respond-to-refereesinstead. That skill cross-references each referee concern against the revised manuscript and drafts a complete response document.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 483 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c9f5a19d25f1
review-paper is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,569 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 6,571 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fin-paper-figure
Generate academic-quality figures (>=300 DPI) for economics and finance papers.
fin-paper-writing
A workflow for turning a research outline and study design into a complete economics or finance paper. It coordinates drafting, figure creation, consistency checks, review rounds, LaTeX compilation, and submission checks.
fin-data-acquisition
A data-preparation workflow for financial research. It reads variable definitions from a completed research design and produces data-acquisition work plus executable Python or Stata regression scripts.
fin-viz-launch
A tool for turning research data and a written description into academic charts. It can choose a suitable chart type, create plotting code with matplotlib or seaborn, and save the result as a high-resolution PDF, SVG, or PNG.
fin-submit-check
A pre-submission checklist for an academic paper and its LaTeX files. It checks journal requirements such as anonymous authorship, length, spacing, margins, citations, figures, data availability, and other submission details.
fin-lit-review
A systematic literature-review workflow for economics and finance. It searches several academic sources, maps how papers cite one another, and organizes the main findings and research gaps.