Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-paper-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/csmar432/finai-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-paper-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-paper-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/csmar432/finai-research/fin-paper-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.04305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.02152 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00861 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00430 |
Grade A, and why
fin-paper-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
经济金融论文写作编排器
编排从大纲到可投稿论文的全流程,管理章节间的引用一致性和版本迭代。
触发条件
触发关键词:写论文、paper writing、论文写作、开始写作
与 fin-full-pipeline 的关系
fin-full-pipeline 负责"研究"阶段(lit→idea→novelty→design),
本技能负责"写作"阶段(outline→draft→figure→review→convert)。
fin-full-pipeline 终点
↓ PAPER_OUTLINE.md + REFINED_DESIGN.md
fin-paper-writing(写作编排)
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 阶段A: 正文写作 (fin-paper-draft) │
│ → 生成 draft_v{N}/introduction.tex │
│ ↓ checkpoint │
│ 阶段B: 图表生成 (fin-paper-figure) │
│ → 生成 draft_v{N}/figures/*.pdf │
│ ↓ checkpoint │
│ 阶段C: 整合检查(章节一致性) │
│ → 验证引用、表编号、图编号 │
│ ↓ checkpoint │
│ 阶段D: 对抗性Review (fin-review-loop) │
│ → 多轮review直到达标 │
│ ↓ checkpoint │
│ 阶段E: 编译 (fin-paper-convert) │
│ → 生成 main.pdf │
│ ↓ │
│ 阶段F: 投稿前检查 (fin-submit-check) │
│ → SUBMIT_CHECK_REPORT.md │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
输出: draft_v{N}/main.pdf(可投稿)
前置条件检查
Phase A: Pre-writing Checklist
在开始写作前,验证以下文件存在:
| 检查项 | 文件路径 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| [ ] 论文大纲 | output/fin-manuscript/PAPER_OUTLINE.md |
章节结构和内容要点 |
| [ ] 研究设计 | output/fin-refinement/REFINED_DESIGN.md |
变量定义、识别策略 |
| [ ] 实证结果 | output/fin-experiments/results/ |
表格/图表文件 |
| [ ] 参考文献 | draft_v{N}/references.bib |
BibTeX格式 |
| [ ] 研究简报 | FIN_BRIEF.md |
目标期刊、语言 |
如果任何文件缺失,停止并提示用户先完成前置步骤。
章节写作顺序(关键原则)
Phase B: Chapter Writing Order
始终使用此顺序,不要按论文的自然顺序写:
推荐顺序(而非论文顺序):
1. Data & Methodology → 先写方法,数据最清晰
2. Descriptive Statistics → 紧跟方法
3. Main Results → 结果最清晰,容易写
4. Mechanism Analysis → 如果有
5. Heterogeneity Analysis → 如果有
6. Robustness Checks → 紧凑汇总
7. Conclusion → 有全篇在手,总结更全面(最难)
8. Introduction → 最后写intro,知道全貌,贡献更清晰
9. Literature Review & Hypotheses → H1/H2/H3框架
10. Abstract → 写完所有章节后,自然形成摘要
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 402 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A f1281660d386
fin-paper-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository csmar432/finai-research (100 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 4,305 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
econometrics-phd-level
A guide to econometrics, the use of statistics to study relationships in data, based on a 12-part Korean lecture series. It routes questions to explanations of topics such as regression, panel data, instrumental variables, and causal comparisons.
r-econometrics
Generates rigorous, modern, reproducible R code for causal inference and panel econometrics with fixest, heterogeneity-robust DiD estimators (Callaway-Sant'Anna, Sun-Abraham, BJS, de Chaisemartin-D'Haultfoeuille), weak-IV-robust inference, optimal-bandwidth RDD via rdrobust, and wild cluster bootstrap. Use when the…
audit-reproducibility
Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.
review-paper
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via…
grant-proposal
Scaffold a research grant proposal (NSF, NIH, ERC, or foundation) by composing existing primitives — pulls identification strategy from an /interview-me spec, delegates the data-management plan to /data-management-plan and the facilities statement to /capture-environment, and emits a funder-requirements checklist. Use…
preregister
Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when…