claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill data-management-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/data-management-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/data-management-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/data-management-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00143 | $0.02644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00529 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
data-management-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/data-management-plan — Funder-Compliant DMP Generator
Produce a Data Management Plan ready to paste into a funder portal. This skill writes the prose and structure; it does not submit anywhere. It is a composition skill — it folds the disclosure-avoidance / IRB rules from .claude/rules/confidential-data.md and the environment + replication-package plan from /capture-environment and /replication-package into a single funder-shaped document.
When to use
- Writing a grant proposal. Every NSF, NIH, ERC, and Horizon Europe proposal needs a DMP (NSF), DMS Plan (NIH 2023 policy), or Data Management Plan (ERC/Horizon).
/grant-proposalcalls this skill for that section. - Before data collection on a funded project. The plan is a commitment you make at award time and report against at renewal.
- When restricted or human-subjects data is involved. The access/sharing and preservation sections change materially — see Phase 2.
When NOT to use
- For a clinical-trial data-sharing statement governed by ICMJE / ClinicalTrials.gov — use the trial sponsor's template.
- As a substitute for IRB protocol text — the DMP references IRB constraints; it is not the protocol itself.
Inputs
$0--funder nsf|nih|erc|horizon— target funder profile. If omitted, Phase 0 detects it from--inputor asks once.--input <path>— a research spec (/interview-meoutput underquality_reports/specs/), a grant draft, or apassport-adjacent description. The skill extracts data types, sample, and identification strategy from it.--no-verify— skip the Phase 4 citation/standard post-flight (inherited from/preregister).
Workflow
Phase 0 — Detect funder + data sensitivity
-
Resolve the funder (
--funder, else infer from--input, else ask once). Load its section schema:Funder Plan name Required sections (abridged) NSF Data Management Plan (2 pp max) data types · standards · access/sharing · re-use/redistribution · archiving NIH DMS Plan (2023 policy) data type · tools/software · standards · preservation/access/timelines · access/distribution + reuse · oversight ERC DMP (Horizon Europe Annex) FAIR per dataset · data summary · making data FAIR · resource allocation · security · ethics Horizon Europe DMP (DMP template) same FAIR-first structure as ERC; open by default, "as open as possible, as closed as necessary"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 126 lines · 143 tokens per session scan A a06dcce1dd80
data-management-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,566 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 143 tokens to every session and 2,644 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aer-consistency
Use when auditing a finished or near-finished AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript for internal consistency: headline numbers across abstract, introduction, results, and tables; sample sizes; log-point and percentage-point conversions; cross-references; and in-text-citation/bibliography matching. Apply after the body…
aaai-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
epd-parser
Extract GWP, life-cycle stages, certifications, and impact metrics from an EPD PDF. Use when given a declaration to parse; not to find or compare EPDs.
fin-paper-convert
Compile LaTeX to PDF and convert to target journal format.
fin-paper-figure
Generate academic-quality figures (>=300 DPI) for economics and finance papers.
fin-paper-writing
A workflow for turning a research outline and study design into a complete economics or finance paper. It coordinates drafting, figure creation, consistency checks, review rounds, LaTeX compilation, and submission checks.