architecture-review

architecture-review is a skill for Claude Code from bullish0x/GameStudio. It costs 71 tokens per session (6,431 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of architecture-review, MIT.

A review of a game's technical architecture against its game design documents and architecture decision records. It creates a traceability matrix, which links each requirement to the decisions, user stories, and tests that cover it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a full architecture review, requirement-coverage checks, cross-decision consistency checks, engine audits, reviews of one design document, or a requirements-to-tests traceability document.
Why use it?
It finds missing requirements, conflicting decisions, and engine-compatibility problems before production work depends on them. It acts as a quality check between technical setup and pre-production.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: agent in frontmatter; names the AskUserQuestion tool; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it for a full architecture review, requirement-coverage checks, cross-decision consistency checks, engine audits, reviews of one design document, or a requirements-to-tests traceability document.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add bullish0x/GameStudio --skill architecture-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bullish0x/GameStudio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for architecture-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/architecture-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,431 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00071 $0.06431
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.03216
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.01286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00643

Measured 11d ago against content hash 6fd8ac1d3208, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to architecture-review — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md · 665 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 665 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Architecture Review

The architecture review validates that the complete body of architectural decisions covers all game design requirements, is internally consistent, and correctly targets the project's pinned engine version. It is the quality gate between Technical Setup and Pre-Production.

Argument modes:

  • No argument / full: Full review — all phases
  • coverage: Traceability only — which GDD requirements have no ADR
  • consistency: Cross-ADR conflict detection only
  • engine: Engine compatibility audit only
  • single-gdd [path]: Review architecture coverage for one specific GDD
  • rtm: Requirements Traceability Matrix — extends the standard matrix to include story file paths and test file paths; outputs docs/architecture/requirements-traceability.md with the full GDD requirement → ADR → Story → Test chain. Use in Production phase when stories and tests exist.

Phase 1: Load Everything

Phase 1a — L0: Summary Scan (fast, low tokens)

Before reading any full document, use Grep to extract ## Summary sections from all GDDs and ADRs:

Grep pattern="## Summary" glob="design/gdd/*.md" output_mode="content" -A 4
Grep pattern="## Summary" glob="docs/architecture/adr-*.md" output_mode="content" -A 3

For single-gdd [path] mode: use the target GDD's summary to identify which ADRs reference the same system (Grep ADRs for the system name), then full-read only those ADRs. Skip full-reading unrelated GDDs entirely.

For engine mode: only full-read ADRs — GDDs are not needed for engine checks.

For coverage or full mode: proceed to full-read everything below.

Phase 1b — L1/L2: Full Document Load

Read all inputs appropriate to the mode:

Design Documents

  • All in-scope GDDs in design/gdd/ — read every file completely
  • design/gdd/systems-index.md — the authoritative list of systems

Architecture Documents

  • All in-scope ADRs in docs/architecture/ — read every file completely
  • docs/architecture/architecture.md if it exists

Read the full file on GitHub · 665 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 665 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 6fd8ac1d3208

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bullish0x/GameStudio (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 6,431 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to architecture-review, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

game-development

Game development with Unity, Unreal Engine, and Godot. Use when building games, implementing game mechanics, physics, AI, or working with game engines.

travisjneuman/.claude · 34 tokens

generic-react-code-reviewer

Review React/TypeScript code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, GPU-accelerated animations, WCAG AA accessibility, bundle size limits, and surgical simplicity. Use when completing features, before commits, or…

travisjneuman/.claude · 71 tokens

generic-fullstack-code-reviewer

Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.

travisjneuman/.claude · 64 tokens

generic-static-code-reviewer

Review static site code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces pure HTML/CSS/JS standards, minimal page weight, mobile-first design. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing changes.

travisjneuman/.claude · 59 tokens

ar-vr-xr

AR/VR/XR development with Unity XR, WebXR, ARKit, ARCore, Meta Quest SDK, and spatial computing. Use when building augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality applications, or spatial experiences.

travisjneuman/.claude · 50 tokens

generic-code-reviewer

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.

travisjneuman/.claude · 70 tokens