Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bullish0x/GameStudio --skill gate-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bullish0x/GameStudioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/gate-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/gate-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bullish0x/gamestudio/gate-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.07151 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.03576 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00715 |
Grade A, and why
gate-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to gate-check — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 542 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase Gate Validation
This skill validates whether the project is ready to advance to the next development phase. It checks for required artifacts, quality standards, and blockers.
Distinct from /project-stage-detect: That skill is diagnostic ("where are we?").
This skill is prescriptive ("are we ready to advance?" with a formal verdict).
Production Stages (7)
The project progresses through these stages:
- Concept — Brainstorming, game concept document
- Systems Design — Mapping systems, writing GDDs
- Technical Setup — Engine config, architecture decisions
- Pre-Production — Prototyping, vertical slice validation
- Production — Feature development (Epic/Feature/Task tracking active)
- Polish — Performance, playtesting, bug fixing
- Release — Launch prep, certification
When a gate passes, write the new stage name to production/stage.txt
(single line, e.g. Production). This updates the status line immediately.
1. Parse Arguments
Target phase: $ARGUMENTS[0] (blank = auto-detect current stage, then validate next transition)
Also resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
Note: in solo mode, director spawns (CD-PHASE-GATE, TD-PHASE-GATE, PR-PHASE-GATE, AD-PHASE-GATE) are skipped — gate-check becomes artifact-existence checks only. In lean mode, all four directors still run (phase gates are the purpose of lean mode).
-
With argument:
/gate-check production— validate readiness for that specific phase -
No argument: Auto-detect current stage using the same heuristics as
/project-stage-detect, then confirm with the user before running:Use
AskUserQuestion:- Prompt: "Detected stage: [current stage]. Running gate for [Current] → [Next] transition. Is this correct?"
- Options:
[A] Yes — run this gate[B] No — pick a different gate(if selected, show a second widget listing all gate options: Concept → Systems Design, Systems Design → Technical Setup, Technical Setup → Pre-Production, Pre-Production → Production, Production → Polish, Polish → Release)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 542 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 663aa9699078
gate-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository bullish0x/GameStudio (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 7,151 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to gate-check, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ml-development
AI and machine learning development with PyTorch, TensorFlow, and LLM integration. Use when building ML models, training pipelines, fine-tuning LLMs, or implementing AI features.
android-development
Android development with Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, and modern Android architecture. Use when building Android apps, implementing Material Design, or following Android best practices.
authentication-patterns
OAuth 2.0, JWT, SSO, MFA, NextAuth/Clerk/Supabase Auth implementation patterns.
email-systems
Transactional email (Resend, SendGrid, SES), templates (React Email, MJML), deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), and inboxing best practices. Use when building email infrastructure, designing templates, or troubleshooting deliverability.
ai-policy-generator
AI governance policy creation for nonprofits and enterprises with frameworks, risk assessment, ethical guidelines, and compliance templates. Use when drafting AI usage policies, responsible AI frameworks, or organizational AI governance documents.
case-interview-practice
Interactive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.