Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow --skill spec-creationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/spec-creation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/spec-creation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/spec-creation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00576 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00231 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
spec-creation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- spec-creation — 100% identical, 20 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec Creation Skill
TEMPLATE: This skill uses
{{PLACEHOLDER}}tokens. Replace with your project values before use.
Purpose
Guide spec creation with clear acceptance criteria, pattern references for execution agents, and testable success validation commands.
When This Skill Applies
- Creating implementation specs
- Breaking down user stories
- Defining acceptance criteria
- Adding pattern references for execution
- Creating demo scripts for validation
- Translating business requirements to technical specs
Stop-the-Line Conditions
FORBIDDEN Patterns
# FORBIDDEN: Missing acceptance criteria
## Implementation
Just do the thing.
# FORBIDDEN: No pattern reference
## Technical Approach
Build it however you want.
# FORBIDDEN: No success validation
## Done Criteria
Looks good to reviewer.
CORRECT Patterns
# CORRECT: Clear acceptance criteria
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] User can click button -> modal appears
- [ ] Modal shows validation errors for empty fields
- [ ] Successful submission shows success toast
# CORRECT: Pattern reference for execution
## Pattern Reference
- **UI Pattern**: `patterns_library/ui/modal-form.md`
- **API Pattern**: `patterns_library/api/crud-endpoint.md`
- **RLS Pattern**: `patterns_library/security/rls-user-data.md`
# CORRECT: Success validation command
## Success Validation
{{CI_VALIDATE_COMMAND}}
Spec Template (MANDATORY)
Every spec must include:
# SPEC-{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}: {Feature Name}
## Summary
{One paragraph describing the feature}
## User Story
As a [user type], I want [goal] so that [benefit].
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Testable criterion 1}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 2}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 3}
## Pattern References
- **UI**: `patterns_library/ui/{pattern}.md`
- **API**: `patterns_library/api/{pattern}.md`
- **Database**: `patterns_library/database/{pattern}.md`
- **Security**: Follow RLS patterns in `docs/database/RLS_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md`
## Success Validation Command
{validation command}
## Demo Script
1. Navigate to {page}
2. Click {button}
3. Observe {expected behavior}
4. Verify {success indicator}
## Logical Commits
1. `feat(scope): implement data model [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}]`
2. `feat(scope): add API endpoint [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}]`
3. `feat(scope): create UI component [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}]`
4. `test(scope): add unit tests [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}]`
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 188 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A bc56fe366ade
spec-creation is a skill published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow (406 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,153 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
bug-triage
Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.
bug-report
Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.
playtest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
security-audit
Java security checklist covering OWASP Top 10, input validation, injection prevention, and secure coding. Works with Spring, Quarkus, Jakarta EE, and plain Java. Use when reviewing code security, before releases, or when user asks about vulnerabilities.
issue-triage
Triage and categorize GitHub issues with priority labels. Use when user says "triage issues", "check issues", "review open issues", or during regular maintenance of GitHub issue backlog.