headcount is an organization of independently installable Claude Code plugins, each grouping skills for a department such as finance, security, or demand generation. Claude Code users install the departments they need and invoke their skills for specialized work; the catalogue entries are skills and related agent tooling from that organization.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill change-and-adoptiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cbrock84/headcountWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/change-and-adoption)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/change-and-adoption"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/change-and-adoption/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/change-and-adoption"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/change-and-adoption.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 65 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00627 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
change-and-adoption scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Change and adoption
The characteristic expensive failure is a system delivered on time, on budget, to specification, and not used. The project succeeded and the investment did not.
Map who is affected and what it costs them
Stakeholder analysis usually stops at influence and interest. The operative question is what each group loses: status, autonomy, expertise that took years to build, a workaround they were proud of, or simply a routine that worked.
Resistance is almost always rational from where the person stands. Treating it as ignorance produces more communication aimed at the wrong problem, and confirms to the affected group that nobody understands their work.
Communicate in the order people need
The sequence that works is why, then what, then how, then when — and organizations reliably lead with what and when, which is the project's perspective rather than the audience's.
State what is changing for this audience specifically. A general announcement is heard as not applying to anyone in particular.
Be honest about costs. A change presented as pure benefit, where the audience can see the cost, loses the credibility needed for everything said afterwards. Naming the downside is what makes the upside believable.
Local credibility beats hierarchy
People adopt what respected colleagues adopt. A message from an executive establishes that the change is sanctioned; it does not establish that it is sensible.
Find the people others actually ask, involve them early enough to influence the outcome, and let them carry it. Involvement after the decisions are made is recognized as decoration and costs more credibility than it buys.
Train at the moment of use
Training delivered weeks ahead of availability is forgotten. Deliver close to go-live, in the context of the real work, with support available in the first days when everyone hits the same three obstacles.
people:learning-and-development covers building durable capability; this is landing a specific
change.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 69 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 9305403537b9
change-and-adoption is a skill published in the GitHub repository cbrock84/headcount (1,320 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 627 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
user-story-map
Build an interactive, drag-and-drop user story map so the user can re-slice work across release phases. Use when the user wants a story map, a phased roadmap, release slicing, a backbone/activities journey map, or to decide "which stories go in which phase" and move them around.
agile-ledger
Plain-Markdown Scrum / Agile product-management system for Claude Code. Manage a product backlog of Epics and User Stories, plan and run sprints, drive a board, track velocity, cut Major.Minor releases, and keep GitHub branches/commits/PRs traceable to stories — all from slash commands, with no Jira and no database.…
agile-ledger-workspace
Optional multi-repo orchestrator for Agile-Ledger. Install once at a workspace root to manage many repositories at once: discover new repositories on a GitHub org (including ones nobody told you about), clone and bootstrap them, run a single cross-repo "what changed while I was away" sync, and reconstruct undocumented…
people-integration
Design the first 90 days for acquired product talent so they stay, contribute, and feel ownership. Produces decision map session template, mentor pairing matrix, 30/60/90 ownership plan, retention risk review (purpose and influence), and 1:1 coaching question library.
roadmap-convergence
Facilitate the post-acquisition roadmap convergence process across Weeks 1 to 8. Produces the conflict log, three-session facilitation guides, merged 90-day plus 12-month roadmap, and the 30/60/90 execution plan.
week-0-readiness
Run a product leader through pre-close (Week 0) integration readiness for an acquisition. Produces the integration lead charter, decision rights one-pager, combined product narrative draft, customer commitment inventory, and the five-question Day 1 readiness check.