headcount is an organization of independently installable Claude Code plugins, each grouping skills for a department such as finance, security, or demand generation. Claude Code users install the departments they need and invoke their skills for specialized work; the catalogue entries are skills and related agent tooling from that organization.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill cost-accountinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cbrock84/headcountWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/cost-accounting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/cost-accounting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/cost-accounting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cbrock84/headcount/cost-accounting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cbrock84/headcount/cost-accounting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 72 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.00834 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00417 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
cost-accounting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cost accounting
Most bad pricing decisions, bad product-line decisions, and bad margin arguments come from the same place: nobody agrees what the thing costs.
Classify cost behavior before you allocate anything
- Fixed costs do not move with volume — within a relevant range. Outside that range they step, and the step is usually large: another shift, another facility, another tier of licensing.
- Variable costs move with each unit: materials, payment processing, per-unit fulfillment, usage-based infrastructure.
- Mixed costs have both, and most real accounts are mixed. Split them with high-low or a regression on historical volume rather than guessing the proportion.
The split is not academic. Variable cost sets the floor for one more incremental order. Fully loaded cost sets the floor for the business as a whole. Confusing the two is how companies price themselves into volume that loses money.
Know which costing basis you are looking at
Absorption costing puts fixed production overhead into inventory and releases it when the unit sells. Variable costing expenses that overhead as incurred.
Absorption is what external reporting requires. Variable is what decisions want. The consequence worth carrying: under absorption, producing more than you sell moves fixed cost onto the balance sheet and raises reported profit without a single additional sale. When margin improves and inventory grows in the same period, check whether that is what happened.
Match the costing method to how the work actually runs
- Job-order — distinct, identifiable jobs. Construction, custom manufacture, print runs, agency engagements. Cost accumulates per job.
- Process — continuous, homogeneous output. Chemicals, food, high-volume components. Cost accumulates per period and divides across equivalent units.
- Activity-based — worth the overhead when indirect cost is large and consumed unevenly. Its value is rarely precision; it is discovering that a low-volume product consumes a disproportionate share of support, setup, or handling.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 74 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 5af23a805aca
cost-accounting is a skill published in the GitHub repository cbrock84/headcount (1,320 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 834 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
stockbit-auth
Log in to Stockbit and capture the session for this server — opens the browser login flow and verifies the token was stored. Use when the user asks to log in or re-authenticate to Stockbit, or after a status check reports the session expired, HTTP 401, or logged out.
morning-scan
The pre-open and first-hour routine for IDX — session state, movers, a scan over a universe, and a catalyst check on the leaders. Use when the user asks what is moving today, for a morning briefing, or what to watch.
save
Save durable decisions, findings, plans, and implementation knowledge from the visible Codex conversation into a new or existing NeatContext context. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to preserve the current conversation as reusable context.
list
List the local NeatContext Contexts available to Codex. Use when the user asks what contexts exist, what can be connected, or explicitly invokes this skill.
build-oxpecker-web-app
Build or modify an Oxpecker web application in idiomatic F#, using endpoint routing, functional EndpointHandler and EndpointMiddleware composition, ASP.NET Core metadata, and focused endpoint tests.
swiftui-app-architecture-workflow
Guide SwiftUI app-structure decisions for Apple apps across App, scenes, commands, focus, environment, preferences, window and document coordination, and reusable view composition. Use when the user wants help deciding where ownership belongs in a SwiftUI app, which data-flow mechanism fits a responsibility, or how to…