Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to crbnos/carbon. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/crbnos/carbon/main/.claude/skills/rust/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crbnos/carbonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/rust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/rust/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/rust.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 81 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.02030 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00812 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
rust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 83ada65971bd
rust is a skill published in the GitHub repository crbnos/carbon (2,783 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 2,030 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
framework-aspnet-core
Guides ASP.NET Core work under its standard: keeping endpoints as translators, choosing each service lifetime deliberately, proving options fail at startup, and testing the request pipeline through the in-process host.
programming-fsharp
Guides F# work under the F# standard: placing each new file in the compile order, reaching a red that fails on an assertion, choosing among option, result, and exception, and finding invariants worth a property-based test.
programming-javascript
Guides JavaScript work under the JavaScript standard: confirming the file is type-checked, typing through JSDoc, validating input the checker cannot see, and noticing floating promises and swallowed errors before handing off.
framework-giraffe
Guides Giraffe handler work under its standard, on top of the F# and ASP.NET Core skills: composing the handler chain in order, binding strictly and validating before the core, and mapping the core's result to a response once.
programming-golang
Guides Go work under the Go standard: starting from the module's recorded gates, placing tests by the boundary they touch, and judging error forms, interface placement, goroutine ownership, and context use.
programming-python
Guides Python work under the Python standard: annotating every signature for Pyright in strict mode, handling paths as pathlib values, placing tests by the boundary they touch, and judging data shapes, failures, and async code.