Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment

Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from docxology/template. It costs 27 tokens per session (306 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A paper-analysis workflow that turns a study's described steps into a graph and rates how reproducible those steps are using quoted evidence from the full text.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for extracting source, method, experiment, and result steps from papers and scoring their content and structure for reproducibility.
Why use it?
It helps reveal whether another researcher has enough information to repeat the paper's methods, while avoiding conclusions based only on a title or abstract.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for extracting source, method, experiment, and result steps from papers and scoring their content and structure for reproducibility.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/docxology/template/reproducibility
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add docxology/template --skill reproducibility
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/docxology/template

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/reproducibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 306 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00306
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00153
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00061
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00031

Measured 5d ago against content hash b34b41c79869, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 6 executable files (__init__.py, extraction.py, models.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

projects/templates/template_literature_meta_analysis/src/reproducibility/SKILL.md · 15 lines

What it actually says

Instructions

You are interacting with the src/reproducibility/ module. This decomposes a paper's own described pipeline (source/method/experiment/sink steps) into a workflow graph and scores how reproducible that pipeline is from the paper's own text.

Agentic Interface (MCP Strategy)

  1. Config-Driven Orchestration: Never hardcode LLM parameters or scoring weights (ContentWeights, StructuralWeights) within Python scripts. Bind them to LLMConfig and the reproducibility_assessment block of config.yaml, loaded via config_loader.load_reproducibility_config().
  2. Evidence-Backed Nodes Only: Every WorkflowNode must carry a non-empty source_quote copied verbatim from the paper's full text. Never accept or fabricate a node without one — this is the node's entire evidentiary basis.
  3. Fulltext Gating: This module only extracts from full text on disk, never from title/abstract alone. When project_config.fulltext.enabled is false and no --fulltext-dir override is supplied, treat a reproducibility_assessment run as a no-op that still yields valid, empty-but-well-formed outputs — never mistake the warning for a crash.
Files

What ships with it

8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 15 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A b34b41c79869

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Reproducibility Workflow-Graph Assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository docxology/template (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 306 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

aerospace-engineering-technician

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 169 tokens

agricultural-engineer

Use when a task needs the judgment of an agricultural engineer — sizing a center-pivot or drip irrigation system's peak capacity against crop water demand, computing lateral grain-bin wall pressure with Janssen's equation, sizing a waterway or tile-drainage system with Manning's equation and an NRCS design-storm…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 90 tokens

anthropologist-archeologist

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Anthropologist/Archeologist working in cultural resource management (CRM) — scoping a Section 106 Phase I identification survey, designing a shovel-test-pit sampling strategy, evaluating National Register of Historic Places eligibility under Criteria A-D, interpreting…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 106 tokens

automotive-engineering-technician

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineering Technician — setting up and instrumenting test equipment (strain-gauge bridges, thermocouples, load/torque sensors) to an engineer's written test plan, selecting DAQ sample rate and an SAE J211 CFC filter class for a vehicle test channel, verifying…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 207 tokens

calibration-technician

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Calibration Technologist/Technician — computing a Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) and deciding whether it meets the 4:1 target, building a measurement uncertainty budget (Type A/Type B, GUM-style) for a calibration, tracing a reference standard's chain of custody to NIST/SI…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 112 tokens

acoustical-engineer

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Acoustical Engineer — calculating room reverberation time (RT60) and specifying absorption/reflection treatment for a space, evaluating a wall or floor assembly's STC/IIC rating against a code or design target, diagnosing why a completed space fails its acoustic design intent…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 102 tokens