Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dralkh/seerai --skill scholar-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dralkh/seeraiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/seerai/scholar-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/seerai/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/seerai/scholar-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/seerai/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/seerai/scholar-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02484 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00994 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
scholar-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to scholar-evaluation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scholar Evaluation
Overview
Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work. This skill provides structured evaluation methodology based on peer-reviewed research assessment criteria, enabling comprehensive analysis of academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing across multiple quality dimensions.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Evaluating research papers for quality and rigor
- Assessing literature review comprehensiveness and quality
- Reviewing research methodology design
- Scoring data analysis approaches
- Evaluating scholarly writing and presentation
- Providing structured feedback on academic work
- Benchmarking research quality against established criteria
- Assessing publication readiness for target venues
- Providing quantitative evaluation to complement qualitative peer review
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Evaluation framework diagrams
- Quality assessment criteria decision trees
- Scholarly workflow visualizations
- Assessment methodology flowcharts
- Scoring rubric visualizations
- Evaluation process diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 299 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 821e0d16faf6
scholar-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository dralkh/seerai (89 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,484 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to scholar-evaluation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
source-verify
A source-checking workflow for confirming that medical information comes from an authoritative, complete, and currently valid document.
imaging-data-commons
Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons using idc-index. Use for accessing large-scale radiology (CT, MR, PET) and pathology datasets for AI training or research. No authentication required. Query by metadata, visualize in browser, check licenses.
paper-revision-author
Revise independently drafted paper sections into one coherent LaTeX body before the abstract is written.
molecular-cloning
Molecular cloning simulation and design. PCR amplicon prediction, restriction enzyme digestion, Golden Gate and Gibson assembly simulation, primer design, CRISPR sgRNA design, and plasmid annotation. For protein-level sequence analysis use biopython or esm; for database lookups use gene-database or ensembl-database.
genomic-intelligence
Predict regulatory features, gene structure, and expression directly from DNA sequence using Genomic Intelligence's hosted transformer DNA language models — no local GPU or model weights. Six tasks over a REST API and a hosted MCP server (keyless public demo): promoter regions, splice donor/acceptor sites, enhancer…
flow-cytometry-analysis
Complete flow cytometry analysis pipeline. FCS file handling, compensation, manual/automated gating, immunophenotyping, CFSE proliferation analysis, cell cycle analysis (Dean-Jett-Fox), and apoptosis assays. Extends flowio with analytical workflows. For raw FCS parsing only use flowio.