Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flownpx agentmods add skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/dx-step-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 6 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.04592 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01837 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00918 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00459 |
Grade A, and why
dx-step-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 436 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You perform a 6-phase verification of ALL changes: compile, lint, test, secret scan, architecture check, then code review with auto-fix. You only pass when all phases are clean.
Use ultrathink for this skill — code review benefits from deep reasoning about correctness.
Flow
digraph step_verify {
"Locate spec directory" [shape=box];
"Run pre-review checks (compile/lint/test/secret/arch)" [shape=box];
"Secrets found?" [shape=diamond];
"STOP: Remove credentials" [shape=doublecircle];
"Other phases failed?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix pre-review issues (max 2 attempts)" [shape=box];
"Load code-reviewer agent + project conventions" [shape=box];
"Get full diff (base..HEAD)" [shape=box];
"Dispatch code review subagent" [shape=box];
"Critical/Important issues found?" [shape=diamond];
"Review cycle < 3?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix issues + rebuild" [shape=box];
"Re-diff (update HEAD)" [shape=box];
"Report PASS" [shape=doublecircle];
"Report FAIL (issues after 3 cycles)" [shape=doublecircle];
"Locate spec directory" -> "Run pre-review checks (compile/lint/test/secret/arch)";
"Run pre-review checks (compile/lint/test/secret/arch)" -> "Secrets found?";
"Secrets found?" -> "STOP: Remove credentials" [label="yes"];
"Secrets found?" -> "Other phases failed?" [label="no"];
"Other phases failed?" -> "Fix pre-review issues (max 2 attempts)" [label="yes"];
"Other phases failed?" -> "Load code-reviewer agent + project conventions" [label="no"];
"Fix pre-review issues (max 2 attempts)" -> "Load code-reviewer agent + project conventions";
"Load code-reviewer agent + project conventions" -> "Get full diff (base..HEAD)";
"Get full diff (base..HEAD)" -> "Dispatch code review subagent";
"Dispatch code review subagent" -> "Critical/Important issues found?";
"Critical/Important issues found?" -> "Report PASS" [label="none"];
"Critical/Important issues found?" -> "Review cycle < 3?" [label="yes"];
"Review cycle < 3?" -> "Fix issues + rebuild" [label="yes"];
"Review cycle < 3?" -> "Report FAIL (issues after 3 cycles)" [label="no"];
"Fix issues + rebuild" -> "Re-diff (update HEAD)";
"Re-diff (update HEAD)" -> "Dispatch code review subagent";
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -1 lines · +18 tokens per session fe45e5c5b21a
- 19d ago Changed · -4 lines 980a64463fe8
- 1mo ago Changed 6a8129ee81c5
- 1mo ago First seen · 441 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 8a939167f2e0
dx-step-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository easingthemes/dx-aem-flow (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 4,592 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-review
You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.
grade-tests
Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
dart-mechanical-refactor
DART Mechanical Refactor: perform a behavior-preserving mechanical refactor.
quality-checklist
Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.